Recyclopedia: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(typo) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info recyclopedia.info]) is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project. | '''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info recyclopedia.info]) is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project. | ||
We might consider these to be the best prototype yet of the future [[Development Wiki]]; It is certainly going to attract like-minded people. | We might consider these to be the best prototype yet of the future [[Development Wiki]]; It is certainly going to attract like-minded people. | ||
''Accordingly, if a lot of these users come over we may need to recruit some [[Blues]] or [[Pinks]] to balance these rather hardcore views. One problem at a time.'' | The odds of a typical [[Recyclopedia contributor]] becoming a [[Consumerium contributor]] are likely much higher than the odds of a [[Wikipedia]], [[Metaweb]] or [[Disinfopedia]] contributor doing so. It seems that it is devoted to presenting a negotiated [[consensus]] between [[Reds]] and [[Greens]] and various [[anarchist]] views. ''Accordingly, if a lot of these users come over we may need to recruit some [[Blues]] or [[Pinks]] to balance these rather hardcore views. One problem at a time.'' | ||
''See some proposed [http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Talk:Recyclopedia:Feature Recyclopedia features] to see if they converge with our needs here, and should perhaps be in [[GetWiki]] for their use and ours.'' | |||