Talk:Coca-Cola: Difference between revisions
agreed, it's bad form to ask for help doing something then delete, Lowest Troll please take note
(Don't tell us to do something, then delete our work) |
(agreed, it's bad form to ask for help doing something then delete, Lowest Troll please take note) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
The article contained information about a company. Information about company behaviour is required as part of research if Consumerium is to decide what the [[buying signal]] should be. How exactly do you propose to provide a good service if you stifle debate about company behaviour? What is the point of the Consumerium if it is not to promote ethical consumption? The article did not say that "Coca-Cola was evil"; it said that they had links with assassinations. This is a case in which [[moral purchasing power]] can help the oppressed workers in Coca-Cola factories. | The article contained information about a company. Information about company behaviour is required as part of research if Consumerium is to decide what the [[buying signal]] should be. How exactly do you propose to provide a good service if you stifle debate about company behaviour? What is the point of the Consumerium if it is not to promote ethical consumption? The article did not say that "Coca-Cola was evil"; it said that they had links with assassinations. This is a case in which [[moral purchasing power]] can help the oppressed workers in Coca-Cola factories. | ||
:Yes, clearly it is time for a proper [[Main Page Researcher]] with guidelines and a proper template for a [[Consumerium:intermediate company page]]. However such pages are not yet defined although there's talk about it at [[Consumerium:intermediate page]]. Also claims of links to assassinations should be clearly attributed with major news source references, or at least [[Recyclopedia]], [[Disinfopedia]] or [[Wikipedia]] references which typically have that already. | |||