Talk:Research Wiki: Difference between revisions
no, don't do that - it's got to be "research" to SOMEONE's standards to get into Research Wiki; Also everything has "noise in it", so the name is not specific enough
m (...thus this is not a good name for a wiki) |
(no, don't do that - it's got to be "research" to SOMEONE's standards to get into Research Wiki; Also everything has "noise in it", so the name is not specific enough) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm going for [[Noise Wiki]] since '''who is eligible for the status of researcher''' will likely be [[faction]]ally contested, thus this is a bad name for a wiki | I'm going for [[Noise Wiki]] since '''who is eligible for the status of researcher''' will likely be [[faction]]ally contested, thus this is a bad name for a wiki | ||
:Um, though, aren't we trying to encourage stuff to be refined to the point where SOMEONE considers it "research"? [[Wikipedia]] articles are usually not good enough to be in an encyclopedia, but it's at least possible to say "that's not good enough to be here". One could ditch things from a [[Research Wiki]] for "not being researched", it's damn hard to ditch things that are just "noise". That name properly belongs to [[Development Wiki]] where everything is truly noise until it becomes code. | |||