WikiVote: Difference between revisions
how issues are elaborated?
(argumentated is not a word) |
(how issues are elaborated?) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* which [[w:voting system]] should you use? for what purposes? | * which [[w:voting system]] should you use? for what purposes? | ||
::The question is already | ::The question is already answered elsewhere, though disagreeing views are welcome. The current proposition is a one-to-one vote: You have one WikiVote per issue. A more interesting question is how and by who is defined what is an "issue". Obivious issues are a [[company]], a [[brand]], a [[product]] and a [[product group]] so we should start with these basics and then expand. | ||
**See [[m:TIPAESA]] for an outline of a typical issue position argument structure. Presumably something can't be a [[Consumerium:issue]] until it has had some time to be elaborated, if this is to be a [[w:deliberative democracy]]. | |||
* how is [[w:user authentication]] performed? By just accounts and passwords, or by IP number, or what? | * how is [[w:user authentication]] performed? By just accounts and passwords, or by IP number, or what? | ||
::The existence of multiple levels of authentication is the basic approach, but the details are yet quite open. | ::The existence of multiple levels of authentication is the basic approach, but the details are yet quite open. |