Jump to content

WikiVote: Difference between revisions

235 bytes added ,  3 March 2004
how issues are elaborated?
(argumentated is not a word)
(how issues are elaborated?)
Line 5: Line 5:


* which [[w:voting system]] should you use?  for what purposes?
* which [[w:voting system]] should you use?  for what purposes?
::The question is already anwsered elsewhere, though disagreeing views are welcome. The current proposition is a one-to-one vote: You have one WikiVote per issue. A more interesting question is how and by who is defined what is an "issue". Obivious issues are a [[company]], a [[brand]], a [[product]] and a [[product group]] so we should start with these basics and then expand.
::The question is already answered elsewhere, though disagreeing views are welcome. The current proposition is a one-to-one vote: You have one WikiVote per issue. A more interesting question is how and by who is defined what is an "issue". Obivious issues are a [[company]], a [[brand]], a [[product]] and a [[product group]] so we should start with these basics and then expand.
 
**See [[m:TIPAESA]] for an outline of a typical issue position argument structure.  Presumably something can't be a [[Consumerium:issue]] until it has had some time to be elaborated, if this is to be a [[w:deliberative democracy]].


* how is [[w:user authentication]] performed?  By just accounts and passwords, or by IP number, or what?
* how is [[w:user authentication]] performed?  By just accounts and passwords, or by IP number, or what?
::The existence of multiple levels of authentication is the basic approach, but the details are yet quite open.
::The existence of multiple levels of authentication is the basic approach, but the details are yet quite open.
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.