Consumerium:Intermediate page format: Difference between revisions

Consumerium:Intermediate page format (edit)

428 bytes added , 26 February 2004

no edit summary

Anonymous user

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 **[[Consumerium:Consensus]] - Summarizes majority user opinions, with documented sources, similar to [[Neutral point of view]] but with some means of balancing [[systemic bias]]es
-**and then [[factionally defined]]
+**and then [[factionally defined]] or at least [[faction]]-scored
 ***[[Consumerium:Criticisms of X]]s - Arguments against product/company.
 ***[[Consumerium:Praise for X]] - Arguments for product/company.
 **and then perhaps individually authored opinions or comments, which might be seen only by those who trust those people as individuals
+If your [[individual buying criteria]] are constructed strictly from those of [[faction]]s, weighing them in some way, it becomes easy to decide what will be shown to you.  ''This is called '''intermediate page''' because it is not in the final display form, but is sucked in to some program that generates the [[Consumerium buying signal]], e.g. in [[Python]] to present on [[worn device]].''
 ''See [http://www.metaweb.com/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=intermediate_page metaweb intermediate page] for an idea of how an intermediate page should be constructed, though they are more likely to call their editor-groupings a [http://www.metaweb.com/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=phyle phyle] than a [[faction]] for reasons having to do with their mandate to extend [[w:Neal Stephenson]]'s work.''