|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| '''Greens''' are a notable global [[faction]] of people with [[common values]] that transcend any country or ethnicity. They are very politically active and although they would rightfully have a place in defining basic [[scheme]] and [[ontology]] terms, e.g. those relating to [[safe trade]] and [[ecosystem health]], the less disciplined types will form a big chunk of the [[Consumerium social club]], and so there is some need to let them have a more explicit form of announcing themselves. Of all [[political spectrum]] [[tendency]] the Green is probably the best defined and most globally agreed on:
| | #REDIRECT [[Silly colorology]] |
| | |
| '''Greens''' hate [[ape genocide]] because it kills and eats creatures so similar to us we should treat them like long-lost relatives, not dinner. They hate [[logging]] in general and not just when it leads to [[deforestation]] - "[[no old growth]]" is a concept they defined. They also dislike [[war]] since it provides excuses to use [[nuclear]] junk, and [[genetically modified food]]. They find [[overconsumption]] and [[overpopulation]] both to be true, whereas most people deny one or the other.
| |
| | |
| ''Many Greens hate [[human]]s and become [[troll]]s, gnawing on vegan tofu as they type nasty stuff at you here. They think they are protecting their Mother, Earth, from "people like you," who think this page is "silly", etc.''
| |
| | |
| Their misanthropic exterior masks the most rational analysis of Earth's problems. Of all [[faction]]s, Greens have been the most specific and scientific, and thus probably the most successful, at getting their [[factionally defined]] terms into the public mind and into the [[law]] and [[media]]. They are very focused, e.g. on [[safe trade]]. They often form [[Green Parties]] and split the vote even for their friends among the [[Pinks]] and [[Reds]], and they are more willing to work in [[minority government]] than almost any other parties.
| |
| | |
| [[Greenpeace]] is probably the world's most successful [[nonprofit]] at online organizing. We can learn a lot from them!
| |
| | |
| The [[glossary]] arose from work towards a [[Green Documentation License]], which may be used in the [[content wiki]], since it will make reference to scientific and other [[validation]], e.g. from [[ecology]]. There may or may not be similar validation requirements in the [[Consumerium License]], but it seems likely.
| |
| | |
| The [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] will have to decide if the well-organized '''Greens''' should be allowed to write a lot of basic definitions, since [[ecosystem health]] is obviously the most basic survival issue on Earth. or if a more representative group should be able to object. And, how much to intervene when Green trolls bite them on the leg for their objections.
| |