Talk:Sense Wiki: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(nah, development is chaos.) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:So shouldn't THIS ([[Development Wiki]]) be the [[Sense Wiki]] since here are the rules and rationale decided upon which turn [[Noise Wiki|Noises]] (from The [[Research Wiki]]) into [[Signal Wiki|Signals]] --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 22:51, 14 Mar 2004 (EET) | :So shouldn't THIS ([[Development Wiki]]) be the [[Sense Wiki]] since here are the rules and rationale decided upon which turn [[Noise Wiki|Noises]] (from The [[Research Wiki]]) into [[Signal Wiki|Signals]] --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 22:51, 14 Mar 2004 (EET) | ||
::No, because developers are basically just noise-makers and noise-filterers. (all serious [[software development concepts]] acknowledge chaos, and the eight-arrowed chaos logo should be the development/noise wiki logo!). It is the researchers who provide the sense, the sniffing out, the intelligence. The world doesn't work by rules. It is chaos, and [[trolls]] simply direct the chaos by organizing it into [[faction]]s and [[campaign]]s, but it stays chaos. Any sense comes from the researchers. | ::No, because developers are basically just noise-makers and noise-filterers. (all serious [[software development concepts]] acknowledge chaos, and the eight-arrowed chaos logo should be the development/noise wiki logo!). It is the researchers who provide the sense, the sniffing out, the intelligence. The world doesn't work by rules. It is chaos, and [[trolls]] simply direct the chaos by organizing it into [[faction]]s and [[campaign]]s, but it stays chaos. Any sense comes from the researchers. And rubber-stamping it as "OK this is a [[Consumerium buying signal|signal]]" is an editorial decision, not anything objective. Let's not buy into the [http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=risk_society en: Recyclopedia: risk society] concept of reality, where somehow there are rational top-down rules that are objectively applied. There aren't, and there never will be. | ||