Blues: Difference between revisions
same invite as for Reds
(#REDIRECT Silly colorology) |
(same invite as for Reds) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Blues''' are a catch-all term for the [[globalization]] faction that set up the world as it is, and have created a strong need for [[Consumerium Services]] because of things they ignore. They will likely be at least a [[tendency]] in the [[Consumerium social club]] saying "oh we can leave THAT up to the market." | |||
''The rest of what is said here is controversial and intends to summarize how Blues will fit into the [[Consumerium social club]] and influence perhaps the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. Since Blues must define their own values and concerns, '''''no one who does not consider themselves a Blue''''' should edit this article - what is here is only for illustration & discussion, and a copy of the original has been archived, so feel free to edit this now. If you think you're being stereotyped, you're right, so please just fix this:'' | |||
'''Blues''' are the good old conservative guys in (blue) suits who come over the (blue) sea and drop bombs on you from the (blue) sky with some Empire. Many think [[Pinks]] and [[Greens]] are cute or silly, and [[Reds]] scary. | |||
They see no basic problem with [[capitalism]] and enjoy [[betting]] on both [[sports]] and the [[stock market]], seeing no problem with basing the whole economy on bets. In this they are kind of similar to [[troll]]s but unlike trolls they try to foment a good [[reputation]]. | |||
Some Blues advocate [[Natural Capitalism]] however or see basic problems with [[economics]] like the [[Greens]] do. Some Blues also advocate [[ethical investing]] and [[moral purchasing]] as a way to refine "the system" without radical change. Most understand how central an [[audit]] and [[accounting standard]] are to keeping any [[market system]] going. | |||
Many may think there is no need for [[Consumerium Services]] because in their [[ideology]], [[economic choice]] is so separate from [[moral choice]] that a buyer who does not choose the lowest [[price]] is "always cheating himself." In their view, no [[price premium]] for a better [[comprehensive outcome]] is better placed getting that outcome, than saved and spent on one's [[nonprofit]] objectives, by oneself. | |||
There are definitely advantages to the Blues' point of view, after all, they rule the world, and it's not for no reason. It should be completely understood. | |||
[[Natural Capitalism]], the [[Green Patent License]] and [[Consumerium Prediction Market]] are three good examples of working within Blue frameworks to do rather radical things. | |||