Green Documentation License: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''Green Documentation [[licenses|License]]''' would presumably put some barriers in place to using documentation for | A '''Green Documentation [[licenses|License]]''' would presumably put some barriers in place to turning contributed [[content]] into [[greewash]], or perhaps using documentation for non-[[Green purposes]] that violate the [[six principles]] which all so-called [[Greens]] believe in, at least according to the [[w:Global Green Charter|Global Green Charter]]. There may also just be a simple set of restrictions that prevent its use for [[war]] and [[ecological devastation]]. At least, to the degree that any license can do that. | ||
While adding [[Invariant Section]]s (which are [[Secondary Section]]s) to the [[GNU FDL]] may warn against use for some purposes, it can't actually prevent such use. | While adding [[Invariant Section]]s (which are [[Secondary Section]]s) to the [[GNU FDL]] may warn against use for some purposes, it can't actually prevent such use. | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
See also [[Green Software License]], [[Green Patent License]]. | See also [[Green Software License]], [[Green Patent License]]. | ||
The [[Consumerium License]] may rely on these licenses to cut some corruption, if the [[Governance Organization]] they use is ultimately compatible with ours. |