WikiVote: Difference between revisions

235 bytes added ,  3 March 2004
how issues are elaborated?
(argumentated is not a word)
(how issues are elaborated?)
Line 5: Line 5:


* which [[w:voting system]] should you use?  for what purposes?
* which [[w:voting system]] should you use?  for what purposes?
::The question is already anwsered elsewhere, though disagreeing views are welcome. The current proposition is a one-to-one vote: You have one WikiVote per issue. A more interesting question is how and by who is defined what is an "issue". Obivious issues are a [[company]], a [[brand]], a [[product]] and a [[product group]] so we should start with these basics and then expand.
::The question is already answered elsewhere, though disagreeing views are welcome. The current proposition is a one-to-one vote: You have one WikiVote per issue. A more interesting question is how and by who is defined what is an "issue". Obivious issues are a [[company]], a [[brand]], a [[product]] and a [[product group]] so we should start with these basics and then expand.
 
**See [[m:TIPAESA]] for an outline of a typical issue position argument structure.  Presumably something can't be a [[Consumerium:issue]] until it has had some time to be elaborated, if this is to be a [[w:deliberative democracy]].


* how is [[w:user authentication]] performed?  By just accounts and passwords, or by IP number, or what?
* how is [[w:user authentication]] performed?  By just accounts and passwords, or by IP number, or what?
::The existence of multiple levels of authentication is the basic approach, but the details are yet quite open.
::The existence of multiple levels of authentication is the basic approach, but the details are yet quite open.
Anonymous user