User talk:Matterhorn: Difference between revisions
(consumerium won't get vandalised) |
(Atag appears to be admitting to knowing "why" Recyclopedia was attacked, i.e. s/he knows who did it, or did it him/herself - please reveal Atag's IP number for prosecution) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::I leave the above here for now, so that Juxo may look at it and comment. | ::I leave the above here for now, so that Juxo may look at it and comment. | ||
::Recyclopedia was just a troll hangout, the only people who got hurt there were trolls. If criticising Wikimedia had anything to do with it, Consumerium would have been vandalised long ago. No, Consumerium is left alone because it has decent honest contributors and a purpose unrelated to trolling. -- [[User:Atag|Atag]] 10:25, 11 May 2004 (EEST) | ::Recyclopedia was just a troll hangout, the only people who got hurt there were trolls. | ||
:::This is provably false. It is also not an excuse for illegal acts such as those the Wikimedia cabal sponsored against Recyclopedia. Articles were being corrected there, a more democratic model of governance developed, both of which were threatening to specific [[sysop power structure]] promoters from Wikipedia. | |||
::If criticising Wikimedia had anything to do with it, Consumerium would have been vandalised long ago. No, Consumerium is left alone because it has decent honest contributors and a purpose unrelated to trolling. -- [[User:Atag|Atag]] 10:25, 11 May 2004 (EEST) | |||
:::The only way to know WHY Consumerium is left alone is to have been responsible for the initial attacks. Whoever believes this is almost certainly involved in the illegal attacks on Recyclopedia. Juxo, we request their IP number be revealed so that we can investigate who should be reported to authorities in the appropriate countries. | |||
Latest revision as of 17:34, 11 May 2004
Welcome to Consumerium:Itself Matterhorn. I hope you find this a good place to partcipate. Thanks for the good work on Wikimedia. --Juxo 13:06, 29 Apr 2004 (EEST)
- "Matterhorn" is a liar, and provably so. His or her lies have been answered to at Talk:Wikimedia. Every single critical comment made re: that "foundation" is accurate and is backed by specific incidents with clear evidence provided from logs and mailing list posts. Matterhorn, you are not welcome here, and if you appear again you will be driven off by trolls.
- Juxo, you must now make a choice again: either you support Wikimedia or you support Consumerium Services. If you support Wikimedia you must find another Lowest Troll, as no one who believes Wikimedia is honest can be trusted to run the Consumerium buying signal.
- Of course, offending the Wikimedia cabal will probably get you hacked off the net like Recyclopedia was, by Starling and Moeller's friends with their crapflooding vandalbots. The correct response to this is legal however not more technological escalation.
- I leave the above here for now, so that Juxo may look at it and comment.
- Recyclopedia was just a troll hangout, the only people who got hurt there were trolls.
- This is provably false. It is also not an excuse for illegal acts such as those the Wikimedia cabal sponsored against Recyclopedia. Articles were being corrected there, a more democratic model of governance developed, both of which were threatening to specific sysop power structure promoters from Wikipedia.
- If criticising Wikimedia had anything to do with it, Consumerium would have been vandalised long ago. No, Consumerium is left alone because it has decent honest contributors and a purpose unrelated to trolling. -- Atag 10:25, 11 May 2004 (EEST)
- The only way to know WHY Consumerium is left alone is to have been responsible for the initial attacks. Whoever believes this is almost certainly involved in the illegal attacks on Recyclopedia. Juxo, we request their IP number be revealed so that we can investigate who should be reported to authorities in the appropriate countries.