User talk:Juxo/Chat Gallery/28.08.2004 with TimStarling: Difference between revisions
User talk:Juxo/Chat Gallery/28.08.2004 with TimStarling (edit)
Revision as of 20:18, 2 September 2004
, 2 September 2004Refusing the Obvious For Life, Making Australia 'Orrific?
m (clean useless mouth flabbing) |
(Refusing the Obvious For Life, Making Australia 'Orrific?) |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Internally it's just implemented as $wgUserTablePrefix, but that's not catchy and aliterative. -- [[User:Tim Starling|Tim Starling]] 18:34, 30 Aug 2004 (EEST) | Internally it's just implemented as $wgUserTablePrefix, but that's not catchy and aliterative. -- [[User:Tim Starling|Tim Starling]] 18:34, 30 Aug 2004 (EEST) | ||
:It would be nice if [[API]]s always reflected [[GUI]]s, but there are too many morons coding both to make that reliable. Call it the same thing as you do on the user's screen, i.e. [[single login]], using that word/phrase "login" or "log in" consistently, and there will be no confusion about what you mean or what features are being implied. | |||
::You can name something as soon as you get off your fat arse and code something. Until then, quit your whinging. -- [[User:Tim Starling|Tim Starling]] 10:45, 31 Aug 2004 (EEST) | |||
:::Seconds! --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 10:46, 31 Aug 2004 (EEST) | |||
::::Coders do not make [[ontology]] choices in any reasonable project. There is no chance that this can lead to anything but disaster. Which anyone who has done any [[data warehouse]] work knows from firsthand pain. It's the [[user interface designer]]s that actually make the choices about what things are called, in a reasonable project, and the [[management accounting]] categories, e.g. [[styles of capital]], that determine the deeper categorization systems. | |||
::::Besides [[trolls]] do not listen to [[developer vigilantiism|developer vigilantes]] of no particular talent. Though they will answer [[Lowest Troll]]s they respect, usually. The latest bout of hack-backs on essential articles is a sign however that [[Wikimedia corruption]] may be spreading to this wiki. | |||
:::::You're not going to listen to me but you expect me to listen to you? Why should I do that? -- [[User:Tim Starling|Tim Starling]] 07:50, 1 Sep 2004 (EEST) | |||
::::::Because all of us [[trolls]] are wiser than all of you [[developer]]s, mate. | |||
:::::::ROFLMAO -- [[User:Tim Starling|Tim Starling]] 03:00, 2 Sep 2004 (EEST) | |||
::::::::assume you mean Refusing the Obvious For Life, Making Australia 'Orrific? | |||
Ils sont mignons tous les deux ;-) ant (editors translation: They are nice both) | |||