User talk:142.177.79.134: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    (foundation)
    mNo edit summary
     
    (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
    Line 3: Line 3:
    :Yes very sensible.  If we understand [[body]], [[not-body]] and [[Open Campaign]] we have a foundation.  Then we can deal with the other six words by factions, then let them battle out multiple points of view to reach consensus.
    :Yes very sensible.  If we understand [[body]], [[not-body]] and [[Open Campaign]] we have a foundation.  Then we can deal with the other six words by factions, then let them battle out multiple points of view to reach consensus.


    :Really going to [http:/act.greenpeace.org people who already know] helps much.
    :Really going to [http://act.greenpeace.org people who already know] helps much.
     
    Yay. Good stuff. And not even a little bit of your normal totally dysfunctional "zero-loop" grammar

    Latest revision as of 08:57, 27 April 2003

    Morning my favourite Troll. I just woke up and you've been busy all nite. I'll make some coffee and diff whatcha been upto now. I hope you like Identifying people. It's starting to make sense for the first time IMHO.

    Yes very sensible. If we understand body, not-body and Open Campaign we have a foundation. Then we can deal with the other six words by factions, then let them battle out multiple points of view to reach consensus.
    Really going to people who already know helps much.

    Yay. Good stuff. And not even a little bit of your normal totally dysfunctional "zero-loop" grammar