User:Jukeboksi/Blog/March2004: Difference between revisions
(todays work and plans for the next days) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
21.3.2004 | 21.3.2004 | ||
Today I've been concentrating on outlining the [[Consumerium Process]] in relation of [[Noise Wiki]] to [[Signal Wiki]] trying to take both [[troll friendly]]ness and '''stability''' and '''reliability''' and practical issues of technical implementation into account. I'll try to merge the material from [[Content Wiki]], [[TCE]], [[Campaigns]], [[Opinion Wiki]], [[Direct Vote]]s,�[[Indirect Vote]]s and [[WikiVote]]s to these articles or somewhere where we can '''have clarity on our implementation plan''' | Today I've been concentrating on outlining the [[Consumerium Process]] in relation of [[Noise Wiki]] to [[Signal Wiki]] trying to take both [[troll friendly]]ness and '''stability''' and '''reliability''' and practical issues of technical implementation into account. | ||
:See comments at [[Talk:Research Wiki]]. Noise implies [[Development Wiki]] more than [[Research Wiki]]. The name "noise wiki" is bad for many reasons. What prevents anyone from putting in any crap, and why should someone who is not basically worried about the [[Consumerium buying signal]], but just wants to write articles, contribute stuff to be called "noise"? They'd contribute diligent "research" to a [[Research Wiki]], probably, but why volunteer good material to a wiki whose very name invites crap? But anyway get the functions right first, names right later. | |||
I'll try to merge the material from [[Content Wiki]], [[TCE]], [[Campaigns]], [[Opinion Wiki]], [[Direct Vote]]s,�[[Indirect Vote]]s and [[WikiVote]]s to these articles or somewhere where we can '''have clarity on our implementation plan''' | |||
:Please combine all the voting stuff into [[edits, votes and bets]] or at least argue for this design there so we can look at how they interact. And yes spending time reading something is a bet of your time. | |||
:There is no final design, so this is not just about "implementation". It's ONE PROPOSED DESIGN. We should have three or four, and they should compete. | |||
---- | ---- | ||
20.3.2004 | 20.3.2004 | ||