Jump to content

User:Jukeboksi/Blog/March2004: Difference between revisions

typo or more likely character encoding mismatch
(Preoccupied in some behind the scenes actions.)
(typo or more likely character encoding mismatch)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
30.3.2004
I'm changing operators about now and thus for a little while I don't have a connection at home. Hopefully the connection will be restored soon
----
27.3.2004
27.3.2004


Line 5: Line 9:
26.3.2004
26.3.2004


I keep getting fun books from my sister. Now I have a Finnish translation of "Die B�rse" by [[w:Max Weber|Max Weber]], which should provide for some interesting reading moments.
I keep getting fun books from my sister. Now I have a Finnish translation of "Die Börse" by [[w:Max Weber|Max Weber]], which should provide for some interesting reading moments.


It seems that at the time of writing ([[w:1894|1894]] to [[w:1896|1896]]) Max Weber was a professor of [[w:economics|economics]] in [[w:commodity exhange|commodity exhange]]s and [[w:stock exchange|stock exchange]]s were not differentiated.
It seems that at the time of writing ([[w:1894|1894]] to [[w:1896|1896]]) Max Weber was a professor of [[w:macroeconomics|macroeconomics]]. [[w:commodity exhange|Commodity exhange]]s and [[w:stock exchange|stock exchange]]s were not differentiated at that time
----
----
25.3.2004
25.3.2004
Line 30: Line 34:
:See comments at [[Talk:Research Wiki]].  Noise implies [[Development Wiki]] more than [[Research Wiki]].  The name "noise wiki" is bad for many reasons.  What prevents anyone from putting in any crap, and why should someone who is not basically worried about the [[Consumerium buying signal]], but just wants to write articles, contribute stuff to be called "noise"?  They'd contribute diligent "research" to a [[Research Wiki]], probably, but why volunteer good material to a wiki whose very name invites crap?  But anyway get the functions right first, names right later.
:See comments at [[Talk:Research Wiki]].  Noise implies [[Development Wiki]] more than [[Research Wiki]].  The name "noise wiki" is bad for many reasons.  What prevents anyone from putting in any crap, and why should someone who is not basically worried about the [[Consumerium buying signal]], but just wants to write articles, contribute stuff to be called "noise"?  They'd contribute diligent "research" to a [[Research Wiki]], probably, but why volunteer good material to a wiki whose very name invites crap?  But anyway get the functions right first, names right later.


I'll try to merge the material from [[Content Wiki]], [[TCE]], [[Campaigns]], [[Opinion Wiki]], [[Direct Vote]]s,[[Indirect Vote]]s and [[WikiVote]]s to these articles or somewhere where we can '''have clarity on our implementation plan'''
I'll try to merge the material from [[Content Wiki]], [[TCE]], [[Campaigns]], [[Opinion Wiki]], [[Direct Vote]]s,[[Indirect Vote]]s and [[WikiVote]]s to these articles or somewhere where we can '''have clarity on our implementation plan'''


:Please combine all the voting stuff into [[edits, votes and bets]] or at least argue for this design there so we can look at how they interact.  And yes spending time reading something is a bet of your time.   
:Please combine all the voting stuff into [[edits, votes and bets]] or at least argue for this design there so we can look at how they interact.  And yes spending time reading something is a bet of your time.   
Line 68: Line 72:
The [[Development Wiki]] has now moved to <tt>http://develop.consumerium.org/wiki/</tt> with rewrite in the old <tt>http://www.consumerium.org</tt> so that all requests to the <tt>wiki/</tt>-subdirectory get rewritten to use the new domain. This leaves the <tt>www</tt>-subdomain available for something else.
The [[Development Wiki]] has now moved to <tt>http://develop.consumerium.org/wiki/</tt> with rewrite in the old <tt>http://www.consumerium.org</tt> so that all requests to the <tt>wiki/</tt>-subdirectory get rewritten to use the new domain. This leaves the <tt>www</tt>-subdomain available for something else.


Contacted J�rg Schulenburg, the author of [[GORC]], a [[GPL]] Optical Character Recognition softaware by email. It looks like GORC could be used as [[product recognition]] server software.
Contacted J�rg Schulenburg, the author of [[GORC]], a [[GPL]] Optical Character Recognition softaware by email. It looks like GORC could be used as [[product recognition]] server software.
----
----
17.3.2004
17.3.2004
9,842

edits

We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.