Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,842
edits
(automatic import of "obvious" definitions?) |
m (Jukeboksi moved page User:Juboxi/Blog/July2004 to User:Jukeboksi/Blog/July2004: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "Juboxi" to "Jukeboksi") |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
:::Well can we add some code like [[GetWiki]]'s to just fill in blank pages with [[XML import]] from [[OneLook]] or [[TrueNames]] or some other service? | :::Well can we add some code like [[GetWiki]]'s to just fill in blank pages with [[XML import]] from [[OneLook]] or [[TrueNames]] or some other service? | ||
::::Nope. Incompatible licenses --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 17:23, 29 Jul 2004 (EEST) | |||
:::::Code "like" theirs is easy to write. Just look at theirs, and write new code that works the same, but is not the same. There is no provision in the [[CC-nc-sa]] to stop you from trying to [[reverse engineer code]]. | |||
It is better to leave open those pages with obvious meanings, so that we can find a way to figure out what they mean in context from their references later. It is also fine to leave [[Proper Name]]s or companies and people open so that they can eventually be directed to acceptable commentary about them. A few theory terms like [[respect for diversity]] and [[wiki mission]] are so wide open they should be defined more by osmosis, and we should wait as long as we can to do so - preferably using examples from elsewhere. | It is better to leave open those pages with obvious meanings, so that we can find a way to figure out what they mean in context from their references later. It is also fine to leave [[Proper Name]]s or companies and people open so that they can eventually be directed to acceptable commentary about them. A few theory terms like [[respect for diversity]] and [[wiki mission]] are so wide open they should be defined more by osmosis, and we should wait as long as we can to do so - preferably using examples from elsewhere. |