User:Jukeboksi/Blog/July2004: Difference between revisions

CC licenses don't prevent reverse engineering
(nope)
(CC licenses don't prevent reverse engineering)
Line 27: Line 27:


::::Nope. Incompatible licenses --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 17:23, 29 Jul 2004 (EEST)
::::Nope. Incompatible licenses --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 17:23, 29 Jul 2004 (EEST)
:::::Code "like" theirs is easy to write.  Just look at theirs, and write new code that works the same, but is not the same.  There is no provision in the [[CC-nc-sa]] to stop you from trying to [[reverse engineer code]].


It is better to leave open those pages with obvious meanings, so that we can find a way to figure out what they mean in context from their references later.  It is also fine to leave [[Proper Name]]s or companies and people open so that they can eventually be directed to acceptable commentary about them.  A few theory terms like [[respect for diversity]] and [[wiki mission]] are so wide open they should be defined more by osmosis, and we should wait as long as we can to do so - preferably using examples from elsewhere.
It is better to leave open those pages with obvious meanings, so that we can find a way to figure out what they mean in context from their references later.  It is also fine to leave [[Proper Name]]s or companies and people open so that they can eventually be directed to acceptable commentary about them.  A few theory terms like [[respect for diversity]] and [[wiki mission]] are so wide open they should be defined more by osmosis, and we should wait as long as we can to do so - preferably using examples from elsewhere.
Anonymous user