User:Jukeboksi/Blog: Difference between revisions
answers and questions
m (wrote an article in wikipedia) |
(answers and questions) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Ok. This is a Blog, blog is just a web page where all the content is in reverse chronological order (kinda redundant: a blog in a wiki, but I'll see if this works). You may comment on posts if you like. | Ok. This is a Blog, blog is just a web page where all the content is in reverse chronological order (kinda redundant: a blog in a wiki, but I'll see if this works). You may comment on posts if you like. | ||
:Thanks, I did. Mostly things already discussed but useful here for those who read this blog. | |||
:Is there going to be a way to govern this thing other than talking to you on a blog? I like [http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/twelve_leverage_points 'leverage points' as used on meta.wikipedia.org to watch/steer wikipedia project] - very low-overhead, based on ecology model. Very applicable here as you try to change resourcing, production, distribution, consumption, and waste systems. Also see Jim Moore on 'assembly rules' for the 'second superpower'. | |||
---- | ---- | ||
15.4.2003 16:45 UTC+2 | 15.4.2003 16:45 UTC+2 | ||
Wrote an small article on [[Consumerium]] in [[Wikipedia]]. Next I'll go for gross overlinking from anything and everything and meaningless minor edits to [[w:Consumerium]] to keep it popping up in Recent Changes. hehhehheehheehheehh *grin* | Wrote an small article on [[Consumerium]] in [[Wikipedia]]. Next I'll go for gross overlinking from anything and everything and meaningless minor edits to [[w:Consumerium]] to keep it popping up in Recent Changes. hehhehheehheehheehh *grin* | ||
:[http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Environmental_scares Paul R. Lees-Haley's description of how scares are caused is interesting] in context of consumerium - because, people will try to influence buying with phony scares, so how does consumerium ensure information is accurate or balanced properly? | |||
---- | ---- | ||
14.4.2003 | 14.4.2003 | ||
| Line 31: | Line 37: | ||
[http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/~sst/is/WebOntologyLanguage/hayes.htm Here] is an interesting article providing some serious critique of using structured document to represent human knowledge. I've been very tempted to mix [[XML]] with some heavy [[Wiki]] for [[Consumerium]] before, but this makes it even more attractive. | [http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/~sst/is/WebOntologyLanguage/hayes.htm Here] is an interesting article providing some serious critique of using structured document to represent human knowledge. I've been very tempted to mix [[XML]] with some heavy [[Wiki]] for [[Consumerium]] before, but this makes it even more attractive. | ||
:[[w:foundation ontology|Foundation ontology]] questions? Very sticky. Start with ecology, harder to go wrong. | |||
---- | ---- | ||
24.3.2003 | 24.3.2003 | ||
| Line 58: | Line 67: | ||
18.3.2003 | 18.3.2003 | ||
I've been thinking about why on earth doesn't [[w:HTML]] or [[w:XHML]] contain tags or meta-tags for connecting a document to a point (or an area) on earth. This would be supergroovy if search engines supported searching for words with results ordered by physical location (very heavy search indeed, I've studied a course on GIS, and even done some work in that area, and I can tell you that multiple 1-dimensional search keys in [[relational algebra]] (that's like what the RDBMS translates SQL into before it is executed) is a picnic compared to even simplified 2-dimensional indexes, let alone if we want accurate real world 3d indexing (Buildings etc. have multiple floors you know.)) | I've been thinking about why on earth doesn't [[w:HTML]] or [[w:XHML]] contain tags or meta-tags for connecting a document to a point (or an area) on earth. | ||
:[http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/ecoregion_DTD ecoregion DTD] is good place to start. | |||
This would be supergroovy if search engines supported searching for words with results ordered by physical location (very heavy search indeed, I've studied a course on GIS, and even done some work in that area, and I can tell you that multiple 1-dimensional search keys in [[relational algebra]] (that's like what the RDBMS translates SQL into before it is executed) is a picnic compared to even simplified 2-dimensional indexes, let alone if we want accurate real world 3d indexing (Buildings etc. have multiple floors you know.)) | |||
Now I have just one thought. '''Forget the web, let's do it for Wikipedia and the rest of the Web can catch up someday, maybe.''' | Now I have just one thought. '''Forget the web, let's do it for Wikipedia and the rest of the Web can catch up someday, maybe.''' | ||
Throw in a standardised way of marking times up and voila: We have spatio-temporal data, that can be grouped and searched in numerous ways, if someone just coded the search engine and if we had some spare processing power for this tedious task. | Throw in a standardised way of marking times up and voila: We have spatio-temporal data, that can be grouped and searched in numerous ways, if someone just coded the search engine and if we had some spare processing power for this tedious task. | ||
:[http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/spacetime_DTD spacetime DTD] is doing this | |||
:[http://p2pmap.org p2pmap] also is thinking of adopting it | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Blog started on 18.3.2003 | Blog started on 18.3.2003 | ||