Talk:Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption: Difference between revisions

responding to the false claim that 142 material is non-encyclopedic: statistically, it sticks as often as any other edits, amazing consider how attacked it is
m (typo)
(responding to the false claim that 142 material is non-encyclopedic: statistically, it sticks as often as any other edits, amazing consider how attacked it is)
Line 55: Line 55:


:[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copies_of_Wikipedia_content_(low_degree_of_compliance) here is a list of all the sites they bully and harass into making themselves the centre of the] [[GFDL corpus]] universe.
:[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copies_of_Wikipedia_content_(low_degree_of_compliance) here is a list of all the sites they bully and harass into making themselves the centre of the] [[GFDL corpus]] universe.
-------------------
''the following was added under''
*false claims added to [[Wikimedia]] article here, and true claims removed
::Note that most false claims here have been made by [[142.177.X.X]] who seems to be on a personal vendetta on Wikipedia for banning him for persistent non-encyclopedic edits in the past
:::This is itself a false claim.  Almost all material contributed by the 142 range has remained in the encyclopedia and passed several [[ad hominem delete]] tests - that is, many people agree it belongs.  Whatever issues there are with this material, it's not it's lack of encyclopedic relevance.  Whenever 142 or similar material is removed, it's almost always [[ad hominem revert]] or [[ad hominem delete]], that is, there is no valid reason to remove it at all, and requiring its removal is simply [[sysop vandalism]].
:::Furthermore, the "vendetta" is beyond anything personal at this point, and includes whole [[faction]]s such as the [[Wikipedia Red Faction]], and even some sympathetic sysops who we do not name so they will not be targetted.
Anonymous user