Talk:MediaWiki modifications: Difference between revisions

mediawiki is going to be driven by Wikipedia cabal, not by Consumerium....
No edit summary
(mediawiki is going to be driven by Wikipedia cabal, not by Consumerium....)
Line 40: Line 40:


::This really should be looked at.  It's Python, but why not copy the exact architecture of it into PHP or Java, and integrate it into tikiwiki or etc?
::This really should be looked at.  It's Python, but why not copy the exact architecture of it into PHP or Java, and integrate it into tikiwiki or etc?
---------
Some of these "features" are disastrously wrong.  While it may make sense to bar certain classes (like anonymous IPs) from making modifications that are immediately publicly visible, it never makes sense to simply reject what they wrote without reading it.  Having "a group that is the only accepted list of authors" is just WRONG, not [[wiki way]] but also WRONG from the point of view of a system that is supposed to be outreaching all the time and including not-well-known views.  Nothing prevents the system from simply not publishing some comment to the world until someone else approves it (say by just signing it).
Of course if you talk to the morons who choose misfeatures at Wikipedia, and who are destroying that project, you will get a wrong idea of what is "needed".
And [[tikiwiki]] has most of these misfeatures already.
There is an effort to make [[MoinMoin]] read a [[wikitext standard]] based on the version of [[MediaWiki]] that is used at [[Wikipedia]], to rescue all the good articles from all those bad people.  That would be immnsely useful, much more so than trusting them further to make extensive mods to mediawiki.  Which doesn't even support full text search in their present configuration.  It's very hard to imagine they'd ever put consumerium first on their list of feature needs.
Anonymous user