Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,842
edits
Talk:False and unsubstantiated claims: Difference between revisions
Talk:False and unsubstantiated claims (edit)
Revision as of 15:32, 14 September 2004
, 14 September 2004first -> first ever, fix link
(anwsers in detail and complete with emoticons) |
m (first -> first ever, fix link) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
::Claiming [[Wikimedia]] has an [[independent board]] is absolutely corrupt - it's quite clear that three of the five members have ties to Bomis, shares in it and so on. | ::Claiming [[Wikimedia]] has an [[independent board]] is absolutely corrupt - it's quite clear that three of the five members have ties to Bomis, shares in it and so on. | ||
:::What the fuck do you expect? They (Jimbo and other Bomis folk) put in a hell of a lot of money, bandwidth, time and effort into building [[Wikipedia]] to what it is today with thousands of people cooperating 24 hrs/day around the world to document the history, human knowledge and going-ons in a fairly transparent way, maybe just maybe a little skewed towards right-wing american gun-toting pro-authoritarian pov, '''but still those that play by the rules are allowed to play''' and you expect them to upon the selection of the '''first board''' for the non-profit which's one purpose is to detatch Wikipedia from Bomis for the apparent reason of avoiding a bias to come up with a bunch of un-involvees that have no clue about what are the real threats to integrity of Wikipedia as an encyclopedia? You didn't apparently play by the rules. | :::What the fuck do you expect? They (Jimbo and other Bomis folk) put in a hell of a lot of money, bandwidth, time and effort into building [[Wikipedia]] to what it is today with thousands of people cooperating 24 hrs/day around the world to document the history, human knowledge and going-ons in a fairly transparent way, maybe just maybe a little skewed towards right-wing american gun-toting pro-authoritarian pov, '''but still those that play by the rules are allowed to play''' and you expect them to upon the selection of the '''first ever board''' for the non-profit which's one purpose is to detatch Wikipedia from Bomis for the apparent reason of avoiding a bias to come up with a bunch of un-involvees that have no clue about what are the real threats to integrity of Wikipedia as an encyclopedia? You didn't apparently play by the rules. | ||
:Anthere was rather dissapointed that you stealthly diluted her responses to the claims you have posted, so it is you who is [[vandal]]ising the pages that are supposed to present the truth, not just the personal hatered of one troll against a internet project which has succeeded so well that it begins to have political weight. | :Anthere was rather dissapointed that you stealthly diluted her responses to the claims you have posted, so it is you who is [[vandal]]ising the pages that are supposed to present the truth, not just the personal hatered of one troll against a internet project which has succeeded so well that it begins to have political weight. | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
::Face it, if these people were not pressuring you, you would not care about this page at all, it would be just be another expose of a corrupt bogus charity. | ::Face it, if these people were not pressuring you, you would not care about this page at all, it would be just be another expose of a corrupt bogus charity. | ||
:::Who? Me? [[False and unsubstantiated claims|this page]]? You must mean the [[Wikimedia corruption]] page that someone moved to [[Alleged Wikimedia corruption]]. Yes, the fact that Jimbo was rather pissed off at some of your '''false''' accusations was an incentitive for me to start thinking about how to get rid of '''untrue rumors''' and '''erronous facts presented as truth''' is a thing we must form a [[Consumerium:Policy]] to deal with since these will arise and there will be [[libel chill]] and [[cease and desist | :::Who? Me? [[False and unsubstantiated claims|this page]]? You must mean the [[Wikimedia corruption]] page that someone moved to [[Alleged Wikimedia corruption]]. Yes, the fact that Jimbo was rather pissed off at some of your '''false''' accusations was an incentitive for me to start thinking about how to get rid of '''untrue rumors''' and '''erronous facts presented as truth''' is a thing we must form a [[Consumerium:Policy]] to deal with since these will arise and there will be [[libel chill]] and [[cease and desist letter]]s of utter threatening feel in the [[future]] to them so we take this as a practice and for the respect I have for Jimbo and his contributions into making information free, as it wants to be. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 18:30, 14 Sep 2004 (EEST) | ||
:::Let me sum up what's happened: | :::Let me sum up what's happened: | ||