Strange articles: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    (Links to strange articles go here)
     
     
    (10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
    Line 1: Line 1:
    *[[Life exchange]] - this is really weird though it just might be that it's 142.177.X.X who wrote it is just thinking in a really radical way. It has some good points about [[dolphin-safe]] [[tuna]] vs. regular tuna. But the reason I'm moving the link here is because 142.177.X.X is using the word "profit" when talking about [[campaigns]], which doesn't make sense to me. Profit is something expressed in money or otherwise increases buying power and there is '''no money''' involved in campaigns, it's about opinions and facts to support those opinions.
    *[[Life exchange]] - this is really weird though it just might be that it's 142.177.X.X who wrote it is just thinking in a really radical way. It has some good points about [[dolphin-safe]] [[tuna]] vs. regular tuna. But the reason I'm moving the link here is because 142.177.X.X is using the word "profit" when talking about [[campaigns]], which doesn't make sense to me. Profit is something expressed in money or otherwise increases buying power and there is '''no money''' involved in campaigns, it's about opinions and facts to support those opinions.
    *: perhaps 142.177.x.x simply meant to use the word 'prophet'? (which could apply to campaigns)
    *:: or profit equated to power? (generalization?)
    *:::More of a [[self-funding]] issue.  This is not so radical if you understand the [[styles of capital]] and [[John McMurtry]]'s and [[Michael Benedikt]]'s analysis.  Give it time.
    * [[142.177.X.X]] has gone crazy (again) and wants a [[Consumerium Country]] or maybe s/he just is on the [[Troll]]ing tip again. 
    *: More like a Troll nation I bet.
    *[[Conceptual metaphor]] - State-of-the-art-troll-article. 1
    *[[Sysops are trolls]] - Mixing up the terminology to confuse someone
    *[[Troll vandalism]] - Mixing up the terminology to confuse someone
    '''Inherently strange articles''' that are needed in development process anyway.
    *[[Best cases]] - an article by our local [[control freak]]
    *:Some of the best cases can be very strange, and may appear not great to others.  But the best way to make these and the [[visions]] less strange is to add your own.
    *[[Visions]] - sheer dystopia/utopia sci-fi hybrid
    [[Category:List]]

    Latest revision as of 16:55, 12 April 2021

    • Life exchange - this is really weird though it just might be that it's 142.177.X.X who wrote it is just thinking in a really radical way. It has some good points about dolphin-safe tuna vs. regular tuna. But the reason I'm moving the link here is because 142.177.X.X is using the word "profit" when talking about campaigns, which doesn't make sense to me. Profit is something expressed in money or otherwise increases buying power and there is no money involved in campaigns, it's about opinions and facts to support those opinions.
      perhaps 142.177.x.x simply meant to use the word 'prophet'? (which could apply to campaigns)
      or profit equated to power? (generalization?)
      More of a self-funding issue. This is not so radical if you understand the styles of capital and John McMurtry's and Michael Benedikt's analysis. Give it time.


    Inherently strange articles that are needed in development process anyway.

    • Best cases - an article by our local control freak
      Some of the best cases can be very strange, and may appear not great to others. But the best way to make these and the visions less strange is to add your own.
    • Visions - sheer dystopia/utopia sci-fi hybrid