...etc). [Here I use "developer" to refer to people actually maintaining the software and server.]" -- [http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developer_Access Brion VIB
795 bytes (108 words) - 11:16, 9 April 2004
*[[Consumerium:Developer]]
*[[software development concepts]]
226 bytes (29 words) - 21:17, 12 March 2004
'''TikiWiki''' is [[free software|free]] [[wiki software]] that supports [[HeeHaw]]. It may soon obey the [[wikitext standard]] set
However, you will never figure that out by using the standard developer sites. See http://tikiwiki.sourceforge.net for incomprehensible and exclus
491 bytes (62 words) - 21:03, 31 August 2005
== software support ==
The [[tikiwiki]] [[wiki software]] uses [[HeeHaw]] to support mobile on all wikis. [[Mediawiki]] has no suc
761 bytes (119 words) - 20:59, 31 August 2005
'''[[MediaWiki developer]] payment''' has been proposed by [[Erik Moeller]][http://meta.wikimedia.or
...robably depends on whose "requirements" are implemented, and whether other software like [[MoinMoin]] or [[tikiwiki]] already did the same things for free. It
932 bytes (139 words) - 01:48, 26 July 2004
...other users is at [[Consumerium:Developer_Agreement]]. See [[Consumerium:Developer]] for overview.
455 bytes (58 words) - 20:42, 12 March 2004
...e Researcher]] while [[Consumerium:Developer|developer]]s read [[Main Page Developer]]. Please also see and support other [[essential projects]].''
...ned under [[GFDL]] [[licences|license]], to develop [[w:free software|free software]] and [[Hardware Requirements|infrastructure]] for storage, transport and d
3 KB (387 words) - 19:00, 26 March 2004
...is specific to a [[demo version]] or [[free trial period]] after which the developer/distributor must receive [[payment]] to permit access again.
This affects more than just [[software requirements]]:
1 KB (169 words) - 17:46, 22 November 2003
A [[Consumerium]] [[developer]] is
*Responsible for knowing all [[software development concepts]]
2 KB (245 words) - 20:48, 12 March 2004
...am Vikki. The occupation I've been occupying for many years is a software developer and it's some thing I truly enjoy. Some time in the past she selected to li
438 bytes (83 words) - 08:13, 9 November 2016
...can be said about these. If this fails they may use legal means against [[software imperialism]], e.g. GFDL clauses violated by [[Wikipedia]], libel laws viol
...an actually present it, as there is no [[wikitext standard]] - a form of [[developer usurpation]]?
2 KB (318 words) - 13:03, 23 June 2004
...urposes of pleasing or supporting their friends. [[Ad hominem delete]], [[developer override]] and [[sysop vandalism]] are the most severe symptoms of such usu
...using server administration methods rather than going through the regular software.
4 KB (625 words) - 00:57, 8 July 2005
'''GetWiki[http://getwiki.net/ .net]''' is the improved software that is a fork of [[MediaWiki]], in use at [[Wikinfo]]. ''It should probab
...nt of view of it taken at Recyclopedia]. It would appear that the primary developer, [[M.R.M._Parrott]], is a simple [[control freak]] with no capacity whatsoe
2 KB (315 words) - 15:31, 24 April 2012
...ally no point in trying to collaborate with one's ideological opposites on software projects. Mr. Parrott is a Kantian Platonist, and he further seems to be a
...otage for commercial purposes. However its primary drawback is its primary developer, [[M.R.M. Parrott]]. Here is a sample of his [[sysop vandalism]] on [[Wikin
9 KB (1,213 words) - 13:27, 24 June 2004
...tard the development of such a standard for the usual reasons (typically [[software imperialism]] - see [[Wikimedia]] for discussion of this.) ''Prove us wron
...he highest of priorities and maybe in GetWiki 2.0, which by classical free software development cycles is far far away
6 KB (912 words) - 18:29, 7 September 2004
...s angry, because I knew would damage the credibility of the vote and of my software. This is in my opinion a strong argument in favour of having the vote condu
::It seems like an example of [[developer vigilantiism]] by [[English Wikipedia User Hashar]] too.
5 KB (877 words) - 12:49, 19 May 2010
...merium:Consumer FAQ]], a [[Consumerium:Researcher FAQ]], and [[Consumerium:Developer FAQ]] eventually.''
...rview the official users guide to editing a page] using this [[mediawiki]] software, which obeys (and more or less defines) the de facto [[wikitext standard]].
8 KB (1,301 words) - 07:02, 7 June 2004
...d defining the modifications/patches that we need to make to the MediaWiki software to enable running [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]]. A similar page ex
Edits to the [[Opinion Wiki]] have to be screened by middleware software to update the composite view of the wiki eg. changes in [[vote]]s or [[scor
11 KB (1,801 words) - 12:55, 6 June 2004
**Developer
:::The hierarchy which puts [[GodKing]] > Developer > Sysop > User > Anonymous > [[Trolls]] is the problem. It is a simple nox
10 KB (1,739 words) - 13:03, 4 February 2005
But on linking to [[Wikipedia]] from other wikis using Wikipedia-software:
...ssues like how to subdivide the [[wikis]] so that people ([[consumer]]s,�[[developer]]s, [[researcher]]s...etc) get adequate access to the information without b
5 KB (741 words) - 00:51, 14 March 2004