...owing consumers to compare prices, or quieting religious critics. Powerful parties should not be permitted to misuse copyright as a tool for limiting bad pres
1 KB (165 words) - 16:25, 25 November 2003
...tiple parties all over the world, e.g. the [[Greens]] which have very many parties.
400 bytes (62 words) - 17:56, 5 March 2004
'''Three Parties Rule''' states that a situation where there are two parties with conflicting interests should be resolved by including a neutral third
...nship and B=E=C relationship is supposed to be good enough even for the to parties to trust their bodies to it! This is what we call [[law]].
2 KB (321 words) - 23:16, 26 April 2003
...iterally no democratic political structures in the real world without such parties. They seem to be absolutely necessary to agree on [[factionally defined te
704 bytes (109 words) - 04:14, 22 December 2003
...owing consumers to compare prices, or quieting religious critics. Powerful parties should not be permitted to misuse copyright as a tool for limiting bad pres
1 KB (217 words) - 16:23, 25 November 2003
...tely science is a culture too, and nothing is completely objective. Green Parties worldwide have a [[w:Global Greens Charter]] that emphasizes the following
868 bytes (125 words) - 07:06, 11 June 2004
If there are only two parties they are looking at each other like the other party is a distorting mirror.
105 bytes (20 words) - 13:51, 23 April 2003
permit energy and material savings to be paid for by third parties separately
312 bytes (53 words) - 16:00, 15 July 2003
- removal of parties who habitually engage in this behaviour, e.g. [[Erik Moeller]], [[Daniel Ma
- apologies from parties who have sometimes engaged in unaccountable behaviours, e.g. [[outing]], su
2 KB (373 words) - 20:47, 7 September 2004
...usable by everyone in 20 years. This is at least time to get some [[Green Parties]] elected or build [[Greenpeace]] up into a sort of global enforcer, but it
540 bytes (90 words) - 23:19, 24 November 2003
A '''consortium''' is a group of companies or parties that agree to cooperate in a way favourable to themselves and their own [[c
515 bytes (80 words) - 20:59, 24 November 2003
...sentative democracy''' uses [[faction]] conflict, i.e. between [[political parties]], to simulate actual warfare that would otherwise occur between those fact
454 bytes (66 words) - 16:01, 3 September 2004
...nd also as a fallback default in case that none of the trusted auditors or parties indicated to be trustworthy by the trusted auditors have signed an article.
498 bytes (85 words) - 20:52, 1 December 2003
...ch other. In democracy this means dividing into pro- and [[anti-ape mother parties]] that debate the actual policy while a [[pan-sapien bureaucracy]] implemen
478 bytes (70 words) - 23:38, 16 January 2004
...ike a taxonomy. I'll fix the article to show efforts done on this by other parties. This is required for the following features [[Intershop navigation]], [[Pr
653 bytes (108 words) - 00:15, 22 March 2004
#Get some wise people to lay down [[instructional capital]] that all parties can accept, that defines on [[what ground]]s [[each type of information]] i
...Historical]] [[Data]] without being encumbered by the work and provide all parties with suitable [[UI]] for their role. Choose [[licenses]] for each of these
2 KB (274 words) - 21:04, 25 July 2003
...excuse several rather extreme [[IP block]]s. The influence of those three parties (all in a [[conflict of interest]] due to their participation in [[edit war
...dents like this render [[due process]] ultimately ineffective by rendering parties hostile to it, and uninterested in further debate about such claims - which
3 KB (449 words) - 20:40, 3 July 2004
...of people claims a similar harm has been done to them by the same party or parties. For example:
...o steps at all to prevent use of names of uninvolved or involutarily named parties ("[[outing]]") in connection with [[false and unsubstantiated claims]] rega
2 KB (348 words) - 17:43, 9 September 2004
...ached, and encourage more casual use of names and damage to reputations of parties otherwise uninvolved. There is probably no clearer basis for a [[libel sui
3 KB (435 words) - 23:02, 9 September 2004
...ser to debate something with a [[logged-in user]]. This would assure both parties they were talking consistently with one person, and, it would be possible f
992 bytes (152 words) - 20:59, 8 March 2004