'''Opinion change is a [[feature]] of an [[campaign]]'''
...ges. If a certain proportion of the [[campaigner]]s call for a [[vote]] on opinion change such a vote will be arranged and as a result a "fierce" call for [[b
571 bytes (98 words) - 00:39, 2 June 2003
...sest anyone has come so far. Accordingly we might ask [[Fred Bauder]] his opinion on this question:
...n a [[Publish Wiki]] will always contain a lot of what some people call "[[opinion]]".
750 bytes (121 words) - 16:55, 5 August 2004
don't have time to form a full opinion on an issue, you could do worse
than looking at RF's opinion and voting exactly opposite them. -Snowspinner[http://mail.wikipedia.org/pi
972 bytes (163 words) - 19:08, 26 June 2004
#REDIRECT [[Opinion Wiki]]
26 bytes (3 words) - 21:27, 18 October 2003
This is a better name for the [[Opinion Wiki]] discussion. Here's why [[trolls]] think so:
...sted than'' that of the "[[Content Wiki]]". If so, who needs it? Unless "Opinion" is just "talk:" applied to "Content"...
4 KB (617 words) - 01:54, 21 May 2004
*[[Opinion Wiki]]
**[[Opinion change]]
558 bytes (81 words) - 13:42, 12 April 2021
...limited or "bugged up" to make it useless. There is no incentive, (in the opinion of 142.177.X.X) once GetWiki dies, for MediaWiki's developers (some of whom
...i just to have a hedge against the [[sysop power structure]], which in the opinion of 142.177.X.X controls Mediawiki code.
3 KB (480 words) - 13:44, 29 September 2004
...Eye view]] in disguise, and point to the nonsense idea that "research and opinion can be differentiated objectively" as an example of it polluting [[Consumer
446 bytes (71 words) - 17:20, 30 June 2004
It's not clear who has worse no-body-expressing-opinion problems, Metaweb or Consumerium, but, whichever does, should set the stand
397 bytes (64 words) - 17:00, 17 October 2003
...by marginalizing critiques of Wikipedia as if they were just one person's opinion:
...t these things done also by the same people in your [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]], you will have to clearly state what's wrong with these policies, an
2 KB (268 words) - 19:28, 13 April 2004
'''The [[Consumerium]] Exchange''' is where people can voice their opinion on which [[disputed article]] or [[campaign]] is closest to the [[truth]] a
...combined measurement for different opinions, which determines the default opinion shown to the [[consumer]] on each issue.
4 KB (656 words) - 01:16, 25 June 2004
'''Funded troll'''s are paid to change opinions in the [[Opinion Wiki]] or alter the way that the project works in ways that favour those wh
...s seems really unlikely if [[marketing]] starts to depend heavily on the [[Opinion Wiki]] here or other traits of [[Consumerium:Itself]].
2 KB (247 words) - 11:36, 11 July 2005
will be [[opinion wiki]] where strict syntax will be
[[opinion wiki]]. [[publish wiki]] will import from
3 KB (400 words) - 18:38, 24 July 2004
...oduction of [[Campaign]] management by [[Wiki]] and the included idea of [[Opinion Wiki]] accepting and handling votes this scheme is a little broken
...Research Wiki]] and [[Signal Wiki]] to somehow overthrow the old plan of [[Opinion Wiki]] and [[Content Wiki]] it is unclear what goes where and how [[Wiki ma
2 KB (345 words) - 03:11, 28 March 2004
...ed bank. Didn't you read this is Juxo's day off so he's not formulating an opinion today?
352 bytes (54 words) - 13:43, 18 April 2004
Suppose two wikis, I'll call them [[Opinion Wiki]] and [[Content Wiki]] as working titles.
...ter security (HTTPS?) for [[Content Wiki]] without performance losses in [[Opinion Wiki]]
3 KB (433 words) - 19:34, 24 July 2018
...together a [[Unified wiki]] approach that unifies the [[Content Wiki]] + [[Opinion Wiki]] (or [[Research Wiki]] + [[Publish Wiki]]) under one wiki. This is no
550 bytes (88 words) - 14:51, 21 June 2005
...tly we are mostly focusing on [[campaign]] management [[wiki]] style in [[Opinion Wiki]], from whereon information will be aggregated to provide composite in
479 bytes (70 words) - 05:33, 16 October 2003
...e ever get around to such a decision: in general, the difference between "opinion" and "research" is who you trust, i.e. which [[faction]], and if you have a
...oregion]]) or a piece of [[advertising]] which is clearly promotional. An opinion starts as the lowest-credibility form of research and those who provide it
6 KB (1,000 words) - 18:24, 20 September 2004
*[[Opinion Wiki]] - Where the campaigning is managed
701 bytes (108 words) - 20:36, 15 October 2003