Research/FI/How to find out who owns what: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
m (clarifying and correcting typos)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
If it's a [[PLC]] you can get it from [[HEX]] or their close associates, but it will cost some money. The amount of money depends on how many owners it has, but this is too expensive to be useful to us. Ten largest owners are known publicly. They're usually [[Institutional Investors]] so that's a bit not interesting
If it's a [[PLC]] you can get it from [[HEX]] or their close associates, but it will cost some money. The amount of money depends on how many owners it has, but this is too expensive to be useful to us. Ten largest owners are known publicly. They're usually [[Institutional Investors]] so that's a bit not interesting


If it's a [[LTD]], just go to their headquarters and ask for current ownership data. If you make the trip you're entiteled to get photo-copies for what photo-copies, like cost, man. The official location of the HQ is publicly known and currently available @ http://www.ytj.fi (not required by the law) or PRH
If it's a [[LTD]], just go to their headquarters and ask for current ownership data. If you make the trip you're entiteled to get photo-copies for what photo-copies, like cost, man. The official location of the HQ is publicly known and currently available @ http://www.ytj.fi (not required by the law) or PRH.


If someone want's the details please let me know and I'll iterate this document
If someone want's the details please let me know and I'll iterate this document
I'm lazy so no precision linking so far, sorry.  [[User:Consumerium|Consumerium]] 18:24 Mar 12, 2003 (EET)
I'm lazy so no precision linking so far, sorry.  [[User:Consumerium|Consumerium]] 18:24 Mar 12, 2003 (EET)
----
7.5.2003
Just today came the news that the law '''might''' be changed so that it's impossible to find out who own [[LTD]]s and only those owners of [[PLC]]s that have over 0,1% of shares are known, which would of course be bad for the openness of the economy [[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 10:09 May 7, 2003 (EEST)
This just in today too:
The [[newspaper]] that raported it discussed some sides of this new motion towards a more [[Closed economy]]. The argument used to drive this motion forward was that it is to protect [[investor]]s from [[spam]]. Also the point was made that [[foreign investors]] have anonymity at the moment.
'''Sorry for the inconvecience.'''
Anonymous user