Greens: Difference between revisions
same invite - this faction is obviously already present
(trolls especially bite you on the leg for censoring this one) |
(same invite - this faction is obviously already present) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Greens''' are a notable global [[faction]] of people with [[common values]] that transcend any country or ethnicity. They are very politically active and although they would rightfully have a place in defining basic [[scheme]] and [[ontology]] terms, e.g. those relating to [[safe trade]] and [[ecosystem health]], the less disciplined types will form a big chunk of the [[Consumerium social club]], and so there is some need to let them have a more explicit form of announcing themselves. Of all [[political spectrum]] [[tendency]] the Green is probably the best defined and most globally agreed on: | '''Greens''' are a notable global [[faction]] of people with [[common values]] that transcend any country or ethnicity. They are very politically active and although they would rightfully have a place in defining basic [[scheme]] and [[ontology]] terms, e.g. those relating to [[safe trade]] and [[ecosystem health]], the less disciplined types will form a big chunk of the [[Consumerium social club]], and so there is some need to let them have a more explicit form of announcing themselves. Of all [[political spectrum]] [[tendency]] the Green is probably the best defined and most globally agreed on: | ||
''The rest of what is said here is controversial and intends to summarize how Greens will fit into the [[Consumerium social club]] and influence perhaps the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. Since Greens must define their own values and concerns, '''''no one who does not consider themselves a Green''''' should edit this article - what is here is only for illustration & discussion, and a copy of the original has been archived, so feel free to edit this now. If you think you're being stereotyped, you're right, so please just fix this:'' | |||
'''Greens''' hate [[ape genocide]] because it kills and eats creatures so similar to us we should treat them like long-lost relatives, not dinner. They hate [[logging]] in general and not just when it leads to [[deforestation]] - "[[no old growth]]" is a concept they defined. They also dislike [[war]] since it provides excuses to use [[nuclear]] junk, and [[genetically modified food]]. They find [[overconsumption]] and [[overpopulation]] both to be true, whereas most people deny one or the other. | '''Greens''' hate [[ape genocide]] because it kills and eats creatures so similar to us we should treat them like long-lost relatives, not dinner. They hate [[logging]] in general and not just when it leads to [[deforestation]] - "[[no old growth]]" is a concept they defined. They also dislike [[war]] since it provides excuses to use [[nuclear]] junk, and [[genetically modified food]]. They find [[overconsumption]] and [[overpopulation]] both to be true, whereas most people deny one or the other. | ||