Green Documentation License: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:11, 23 August 2003

A Green Documentation License would presumably put some barriers in place to using documentation for any purposes that violates the six principles which all so-called Greens believe in, at least according to the Global Green Charter. There may also just be a simple set of restrictions that prevent its use for war and ecological devastation. At least, to the degree that any license can do that.

While adding Invariant Sections (which are Secondary Sections) to the GNU FDL may warn against use for some purposes, it can't actually prevent such use.

A GDL is clearly not Free according to Debian. But of course, who cares?

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-A '''Green Documentation [[licenses|License]]''' would presumably put some barriers in place to using documentation for any purposes that violates the [[six principles]] which all so-called [[w:Greens|Greens]] believe in, at least according to the [[w:Global Green Charter|Global Green Charter]].  There may also just be a simple set of restrictions that prevent its use for war and ecological devastation.  At least, to the degree that any license can do that.
+A '''Green Documentation [[licenses|License]]''' would presumably put some barriers in place to using documentation for any purposes that violates the [[six principles]] which all so-called [[w:Greens|Greens]] believe in, at least according to the [[w:Global Green Charter|Global Green Charter]].  There may also just be a simple set of restrictions that prevent its use for [[war]] and [[ecological devastation]].  At least, to the degree that any license can do that.
+While adding [[Invariant Section]]s (which are [[Secondary Section]]s) to the [[GNU FDL]] may warn against use for some purposes, it can't actually prevent such use.
+A GDL is clearly not [[Free according to Debian]].  But of course, who cares?
 See also [[Green Software License]], [[Green Patent License]].