Green Documentation License: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''Green Documentation [[licenses|License]]''' would presumably put some barriers in place to using documentation for any purposes that violates the [[six principles]] which all so-called [[w:Greens|Greens]] believe in, at least according to the [[w:Global Green Charter|Global Green Charter]].  There may also just be a simple set of restrictions that prevent its use for [[war]] and [[ecological devastation]].  At least, to the degree that any license can do that.
A '''Green Documentation [[licenses|License]]''' would presumably put some barriers in place to turning contributed [[content]] into [[greewash]], or perhaps using documentation for non-[[Green purposes]] that violate the [[six principles]] which all so-called [[Greens]] believe in, at least according to the [[w:Global Green Charter|Global Green Charter]].  There may also just be a simple set of restrictions that prevent its use for [[war]] and [[ecological devastation]].  At least, to the degree that any license can do that.


While adding [[Invariant Section]]s (which are [[Secondary Section]]s) to the [[GNU FDL]] may warn against use for some purposes, it can't actually prevent such use.   
While adding [[Invariant Section]]s (which are [[Secondary Section]]s) to the [[GNU FDL]] may warn against use for some purposes, it can't actually prevent such use.   
Line 6: Line 6:


See also [[Green Software License]], [[Green Patent License]].
See also [[Green Software License]], [[Green Patent License]].
The [[Consumerium License]] may rely on these licenses to cut some corruption, if the [[Governance Organization]] they use is ultimately compatible with ours.
Anonymous user