Direct Vote

Revision as of 12:40, 5 October 2003 by Jukeboksi (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is perhaps a little unfair since people who don't have access to computer systems are likely unable to use their direct vote. Burden of proof on authentication is yet to be solved. A partial solution could be to divide the direct votes into three distinct groups and let the consumers decide on the amount of trust they place on each group of voters:

  1. Voters authenticated with cryptographic methods, where the identity of the keyholder is known by an commercial or non-commercial certification authority.
  2. Voters authenticated by an email address issued by an institutional issuer such as an university, school, company or a governmental organisation ie. where it is publicly known that the postmaster checks the identities of people before issuing an email address
  3. The rest ie. anonymous email services