Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,842
edits
Design paradigm: Difference between revisions
Linking to Question
(moved here for more descriptive article naming) |
(Linking to Question) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Resolving the "Who gets to say what about what on what grounds?"-issue== | ==Resolving the "Who gets to say what about what on what grounds?"-issue== | ||
===Default to the Last Signed Version Signed By the Default | ===Default to the Last Signed Version Signed By the [[Default Signer]]=== | ||
:Consumerium default will most likely be that [[Consumer]]s don't see the '''live version''' from the wiki, but the '''last signed version''' signed by whoever you deem as an authority on the article in question. Since anyone can make their own defaults file and pass it along as "the real deal" the Consumerium defaults don't matter much. | :Consumerium default will most likely be that [[Consumer]]s don't see the '''live version''' from the wiki, but the '''last signed version''' signed by whoever you deem as an authority on the article in question. Since anyone can make their own defaults file and pass it along as "the real deal" the Consumerium defaults don't matter much. | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:Maybe anyone can sign any version of any article, thus leaving up to the Consumer to decide | :Maybe anyone can sign any version of any article, thus leaving up to the Consumer to decide | ||
:who to trust or | :[[Trusted auditor|who to trust]] or | ||
:who to trust on who to trust or | :who to trust on who to trust or | ||
:who to trust on who to trust on who to trust or | :who to trust on who to trust on who to trust or | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
::There are always at least two points of view, one being the producer's, another being those who are questioning the producer's integrity. Finding out the [[w:truth|truth]] is an [[w:adversarial process|adversarial process]] where only consumers can ultimately decide who to trust. | ::There are always at least two points of view, one being the producer's, another being those who are questioning the producer's integrity. Finding out the [[w:truth|truth]] is an [[w:adversarial process|adversarial process]] where only consumers can ultimately decide who to trust. | ||
:::[[Question]] - Disputes were in the second design revision handled by splitting disputed articles and listing them on [[TCE]]. How should point of view disputes be resolved now | |||