Anarcopedia: Difference between revisions

    No edit summary
     
    (rm speculation about claimed bot attacks on recyclopedia. We've been through this before, remember?)
    Line 1: Line 1:
    The '''Anarchopedia''' [http://anarchopedia.org .org] is the first [[large public wiki]] to attempt to eliminate all [[sysop vandalism]].  It does this largely by letting any user [[undelete page]]s, making [[ad hominem delete]] no worse a problem than [[ad hominem revert]].  Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all.
    The '''Anarchopedia''' [http://anarchopedia.org .org] is the first [[large public wiki]] to attempt to eliminate all [[sysop vandalism]].  It does this largely by letting any user [[undelete page]]s, making [[ad hominem delete]] no worse a problem than [[ad hominem revert]].  Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all.


    This builds on prior efforts at [[Recyclopedia]] that were censored/attacked/vandalized by supporters of [[Wikimedia]] who had preferential access to [[vandalbot]] technology developed by [[Tim Starling]], a notable advocate of [[technological escalation]] to prevent the [[New Troll point of view]] from spreading.
    '''Anarchopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]].  There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]].
     
    By contrast, '''Anarchopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]].  There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]].


    It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]].  It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations.
    It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]].  It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations.