Anarcopedia: Difference between revisions
(not all Anarchopedia users seem to have undelete rights currently. An interesting theory, but not fully applied and apparently not applicable in practice without a hint of sysopitivity) |
(nothing disputed here, the vandalbot attacks were clearly technological, and there is only one technology to do that to mediawiki, and Tim Starling developed it) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''Anarchopedia''' [http://anarchopedia.org .org] is the first [[large public wiki]] to attempt to eliminate all [[sysop vandalism]]. | The '''Anarchopedia''' [http://anarchopedia.org .org] is the first [[large public wiki]] to attempt to eliminate all [[sysop vandalism]]. | ||
Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all. | It's original stated goal was to let any user [[undelete page]]s, making [[ad hominem delete]] no worse a problem than [[ad hominem revert]]. Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all. Apparently it has not lived up to this goal fully. | ||
'''Anarchopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]]. There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]]. | The Anarchopedia's policy effort builds on prior efforts at [[Recyclopedia]] - an attempt to build a [[large public wiki]] without use of [[sysop]] powers at all. This failed however when many pages were renamed, censored, attacked, vandalized and moved by overt supporters of [[Wikimedia]] - ''this is not disputed'' - who had preferential access to [[vandalbot]] technology developed by [[Tim Starling]], - ''this is not disputed'' - a notable advocate of [[technological escalation]] - likely to prevent the [[New Troll point of view]] from spreading. The Recyclopedia failed, and evidence of the above was largely removed from view. | ||
By contrast, '''Anarchopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]]. There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]]. | |||
It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]]. It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations. | It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]]. It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations. | ||