Jump to content

Anarcopedia: Difference between revisions

239 bytes added ,  26 January 2005
mv the recyclopedia attacks para fully to talk page, leaving the first sentence of it here.
(rm speculation about claimed bot attacks on recyclopedia. We've been through this before, remember?)
(mv the recyclopedia attacks para fully to talk page, leaving the first sentence of it here.)
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Anarchopedia''' [http://anarchopedia.org .org] is the first [[large public wiki]] to attempt to eliminate all [[sysop vandalism]].  It does this largely by letting any user [[undelete page]]s, making [[ad hominem delete]] no worse a problem than [[ad hominem revert]].  Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all.
The '''Anarchopedia''' [http://anarchopedia.org .org] is the first [[large public wiki]] to attempt to eliminate all [[sysop vandalism]].   


'''Anarchopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]].  There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]].
It's original stated goal was to let any user [[undelete page]]s, making [[ad hominem delete]] no worse a problem than [[ad hominem revert]].  Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all.  Apparently it has not lived up to this goal fully.
 
The Anarchopedia's policy effort builds on prior efforts at [[Recyclopedia]] - an attempt to build a [[large public wiki]] without use of [[sysop]] powers at all.
 
By contrast, '''Anarchopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]].  There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]].


It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]].  It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations.
It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]].  It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations.
9,842

edits

We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.