Alternate wiki-implementations: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    (for assessing the ups and downs offered by various wiki implementations. so please the discussion around that around here)
     
    (starting head-to-head comparison of alternatives (stubbish))
    Line 1: Line 1:
    Currently 3 out of 20 of our registered users are registered [[MediaWiki]] developers, which makes our percentage of developers among users '''15%''', which is likely the highest figure any public MediaWiki installation can boost so that is an good incentative to try to adapt MediaWiki for our use over other wikis
    Currently 3 out of 20 of our registered users are registered [[MediaWiki]] developers, which makes our percentage of developers among users '''15%''', which is likely the highest figure any public MediaWiki installation can boost so that is an good incentative to try to adapt MediaWiki for our use over other wikis
    ----
    <table>
    <tr>
    <th>MediaWiki</th><th>TikiWiki</th><th>MoinMoin</th>
    </tr>
    <td>
    *Proven to perform well under heavy load
    *Interaction between other systems the same software is needed
    *Worked good for R&D purposes
    *Dedicated developer community
    *A very high ratio of developers (15% oof registered users) registered in [[consumerium]]
    </td>
    <td>
    *Group management built-in
    *Visualization of wiki-links
    *Polls built in
    </td>
    <td>
    *Good parser
    *???
    </td>
    </tr>
    </table>


    ----
    ----

    Revision as of 23:11, 6 November 2003

    Currently 3 out of 20 of our registered users are registered MediaWiki developers, which makes our percentage of developers among users 15%, which is likely the highest figure any public MediaWiki installation can boost so that is an good incentative to try to adapt MediaWiki for our use over other wikis


    MediaWikiTikiWikiMoinMoin
    • Proven to perform well under heavy load
    • Interaction between other systems the same software is needed
    • Worked good for R&D purposes
    • Dedicated developer community
    • A very high ratio of developers (15% oof registered users) registered in consumerium
    • Group management built-in
    • Visualization of wiki-links
    • Polls built in
    • Good parser
    • ???

    See also: