142.177.X.X: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

142.177.X.X (edit)

Revision as of 09:08, 13 July 2012

598 bytes removed , 13 July 2012

142.177.X.X has a wiki, Lsb or http://let.sysops.be with evolving ontologies and fresh stuff

Jukeboksi

Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators

9,842

edits

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 .177.X.X is a [[w:robot]]; it examines wiki history for controversy and pastes text into related articles. <br>
 .177.X.X is a [[w:cult]]; it has beliefs, priests, rituals. <br>
+.177.X.X has a wiki, [[Lsb]] or http://let.sysops.be/wiki/ with evolving ontologies and fresh material around the year :D
 .177.X.X is most famous for the amazing feat of succeding to write [[w:Formal method for evaluating and quantifying ethicality and morality of human actions]] and kept it off [[w:Wikipedia:Votes for deletion]] for a looong time. '''Now the article has been deleted'''
@@ Line 15: / Line 16: @@
 :Thank you.  But the credit belongs only to my souped-up Commodore 64.  It is a very wise machine.
+::Nonsense. Machines cannot be wise, only intelligent.
 :But perhaps that article is simply *correct* and can thus be used to design the consumerium version of the method?
@@ Line 31: / Line 34: @@
 ----
 .177.X.X often accuses other people of doing things or not doing things that he then proceeds to do or not do, respectively. For an example see http://develop.consumerium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:False_and_unsubstantiated_claims&curid=2818&diff=5266&oldid=5259 (about the complaint about the way that 142.177.X.X merged of Anthere's replies to his allegations with the allegations) and http://develop.consumerium.org/wiki/index.php?title=False_or_unsubstantiated_claims_of_corruption&curid=2782&diff=5261&oldid=5260 (where he makes edits not mentioned in the summary and removes someone else's (mine) edits while adding his own elsewhere in the article) --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 18:52, 14 Sep 2004 (EEST)
-::[[Trolls]] would NEVER do such things to articles from [[New Troll point of view]] or [[sympathetic point of view]] and don't even do them usually to those from [[neutral point of view]].  But since that one article is from [[Sysop Vandal point of view]] we are obligated to simply replace lies with the truth, and not try to be "fair" to people who are basically just lying about whatever they think they have to lie about to solve their own problems in the moment, i.e. [[Wikimedia]].
-::So this is irrelevant to the rest of [[Consumerium]] since only that one article is from [[Sysop Vandal point of view]], and its talk page is full of basically nonsense and squabbling.  The title itself makes the article and all talk about it stupid.