Search results

  • ...ing the [[Lowest Troll]] to be a Despot, Dictator, Fascist, [[Sysop]] or [[GodKing]] with [[God's Eye View]].
    3 KB (400 words) - 18:38, 24 July 2004
  • ...estly and lets any contributor, including [[trolls]], help it do so, the [[GodKing]]s of such projects rightfully consider us a threat to their power, and att
    3 KB (432 words) - 08:14, 26 September 2004
  • ...rce specifically to enable [[moral purchasing]], which means only what the GodKing and his sysops say it means.
    3 KB (547 words) - 11:47, 28 October 2018
  • *[[God's Eye View]] of course, which leads inexorably to worship of a [[GodKing]]
    2 KB (369 words) - 00:27, 12 August 2004
  • ...espected by the [[sysop power structure]], i.e. a personal friend of the [[GodKing]]) who is on a more or less continuous [[witch-hunt]].
    3 KB (416 words) - 20:57, 7 January 2004
  • ...and should be employed only for [[inquisitor]]s and the more persistent [[GodKing]] minions - those who literally can't seem to comprehend any other way to d
    2 KB (398 words) - 21:06, 7 January 2004
  • ...ory actions enforced by [[w:fiat]], e.g. sysop status, Militia approval, [[GodKing]] [[w:monarchy]], or whatever.
    2 KB (395 words) - 18:27, 28 June 2004
  • ...you should do little or nothing until the [[power structure]] (or just a [[GodKing]]) is offended. This conserves energy and avoids revealing sensitivities.
    3 KB (404 words) - 18:11, 20 February 2004
  • ...into existence by a [[priestly hierarchy]] of [[sysop]]s loyal to their [[GodKing]].
    4 KB (550 words) - 13:35, 2 July 2010
  • 3. For purposes of knuckling under to [[libel chill]] by [[GodKing]]s and so on:
    3 KB (438 words) - 16:58, 9 September 2004
  • :::The hierarchy which puts [[GodKing]] > Developer > Sysop > User > Anonymous > [[Trolls]] is the problem. It i ...do real world group management. They're always the worst example, e.g. of GodKing or just being a libel pit where anyone can lie about anyone else without an
    10 KB (1,739 words) - 13:03, 4 February 2005
  • ...s or trustworthiness. This is literally self-worship, unsurprising in a [[GodKing]].
    3 KB (444 words) - 17:38, 21 June 2004
  • ...each other's orders, e.g. the [[priestly hierarchy]] that surrounds the [[GodKing]] preaching [[Wikimedia corruption]] and [[systemic bias]] as a [[Good Thin
    3 KB (429 words) - 15:55, 5 September 2004
  • ...]] or [[due process]] system can overcome it. For instance, status of a [[GodKing]] as the sole arbiter of disputes, reliance on [[technological escalation]]
    3 KB (515 words) - 22:01, 7 May 2004
  • ...heological power structure considerably. It is no accident that the term [[GodKing]] is used to describe the user of last resort. ...r own they tend to be [[little tin god]]s - each hoping to grow up to be [[GodKing]]. This shouldn't be encouraged. Nor should a clique of [[usurper]]s doin
    10 KB (1,554 words) - 15:53, 3 June 2005
  • ...ty to a particular faction or one of the "four gs" [[golf]], [[gold]], a [[GodKing]] or [[Global warming promotion society]]
    2 KB (332 words) - 20:14, 16 July 2012
  • ...things which are actually [[political dispute]]s. Wikipedia is run by a [[GodKing]] who reserves to himself the right to resolve or even redefine any politic
    4 KB (618 words) - 17:38, 2 July 2004
  • ...that the [[sysop power structure]] is so irresponsible that it, and its [[GodKing]], must either change, or lose the best contributors with the highest integ
    4 KB (618 words) - 21:56, 7 January 2004
  • ...]] and replacing it with a more accountable structure with no history of [[GodKing]]s nor [[priestly hierarchy]] nor [[command hierarchy]]. ''See the analysi ...h, since the guiltiest parties actually can't read those languages. The [[GodKing]], Jim Wales, can't read or write any language other than English. This is
    14 KB (2,286 words) - 14:00, 3 January 2005
  • ...:Wikipedia Governance]] for debate on one-man rule over there. See also [[GodKing]].''
    4 KB (618 words) - 23:45, 25 January 2005
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)