...t's what the ISO says, anyway. And they set standards, not trolls and not developers.
5 KB (741 words) - 00:51, 14 March 2004
#[[MediaWiki]] unmodified
#'''[[MediaWiki modifications|MediaWiki modified]]'''
6 KB (977 words) - 15:53, 28 August 2004
#[[MediaWiki]] unmodified
#'''[[MediaWiki modifications|MediaWiki modified]]'''
7 KB (1,005 words) - 05:26, 29 August 2004
...albot]] code is likewise distributed by [[developer vigilantiism|Mediawiki developers]] and known to be used in [[denial of service attack]]s, e.g. on [[Recyclop
3 KB (435 words) - 23:02, 9 September 2004
...y to avoid imposing [[hard security]] if this path is taken by developers. Mediawiki does seem to be evolving in this direction.
4 KB (722 words) - 15:54, 24 January 2005
Laziness and general lack of algorithmitically competent developers led to the [[UI]] being done by (X)HTML rather then the dedicated [[Consume
...ated into a view by code plugged into a [[MediaWiki modifications|modified mediawiki software]]
4 KB (644 words) - 10:00, 1 March 2004
...cyclopedia]] or [[wikipedia]] or any number and choice of [[GetWiki]] or [[MediaWiki]] running [[wikis]]?
...pace, as these are not in general relevant to [[Consumerium]] or even to [[mediawiki]]. Rewrites could help get some concepts clearer, and link them to the iss
9 KB (1,213 words) - 13:27, 24 June 2004
...Wiki-2020-logo.svg|thumb|right|160px|Big thanks to MediaWiki and extension developers and documenters!]]
...ng|thumb|right|160px|Big thanks to the Document Foundation and LibreOffice developers and documenters!]]
8 KB (1,240 words) - 22:28, 27 May 2022
I think [[Wikipedia]] sysops and [[MediaWiki]] developers are putting in considerable consideration into trying to form good practice
5 KB (747 words) - 20:19, 15 July 2004
...pages. ''Typically the [[Language:User:]] space is reserved for this on [[MediaWiki-based service]]s.''
...of [[GetWiki]] space, was censored by the particularly stupid [[GetWiki]] developers, who seem clearly only interested in their own commercial benefit.
4 KB (620 words) - 19:27, 28 August 2004
No, that's wrong. Look at the MediaWiki user base - mostly at Wikipedia. These people do group management very ver
...serious [[social software]]! This is a very good reason to get away from MediaWiki and not to trust the people working on it. They are just not politically m
10 KB (1,739 words) - 13:03, 4 February 2005
...e is there that [[MediaWiki]] will *ever* be useful for this purpose? Its developers are only interested in [[Wikipedia]], and in increasing the power of their
5 KB (753 words) - 13:39, 9 September 2004
See also: [[mw:Manual:Managing data in MediaWiki]] at mediawiki.org
...erlying software is the '''[[#Wikibase|Wikibase]]''' which consists of 2 [[Mediawiki]] extensions, the [[mw:Extension:Wikibase Repository|Wikibase Repository]]
13 KB (1,740 words) - 18:45, 4 January 2024
...and spends most money it receives as donations on providing hardware for [[MediaWiki]] sites such as [[Wikipedia]]s and [[Wiktionary|Wiktionaries]]. There are
==Claims of funding used to support MediaWiki software development==
10 KB (1,627 words) - 07:36, 13 July 2010
The '''board vote code''' in [[MediaWiki]] uses [[public key crypto]] to enable an [[audit trail]]. No other [[wik
...isms, this one is certainly open to rigging and spying at least by its own developers. There is probably no way around that.
11 KB (1,936 words) - 13:40, 9 September 2004
...information feedback is far from perfect. In any cases, the development of MediaWiki is not in the hand of Wikimedia itself. So, this argument, if it were true,
''For issues with developers and others without official status, see [[Talk:alleged Wikimedia corruption
18 KB (2,843 words) - 14:25, 29 September 2004
...a particular [[sysop]]. Likely the [[cabal]] or [[clique]] or [[mediawiki developers]] or what/whoever sees no point in this kind of feature. For the other poin
9 KB (1,475 words) - 15:32, 14 September 2004
...Bomis) currently according to several (unnamed per request) [[MediaWiki]] developers with shell access to all machines.
...u are welcome to fetch the code, compile and try it out on your own free [[MediaWiki]] installation (free too) if you have the time and a working computer (pref
18 KB (2,874 words) - 15:46, 28 September 2004
...format]] because it will be sucked in by other non-wiki (or at least non-[[mediawiki]]) software to generate the [[Consumerium buying signal]]. [[Metaweb]] use
...kipedia]], a similar situation, you have a main page that is basically for developers and frequent contributors, and to find the stuff of general interest there'
15 KB (2,510 words) - 15:06, 11 July 2013
...en running since July 2002; this "Phase III" software is now also called [[MediaWiki]]. Brion Vibber has since taken the lead in fixing bugs and tuning the data
*[http://wikipedia.sourceforge.net MediaWiki Phase III Software] at [[SourceForge]]
19 KB (2,807 words) - 16:48, 9 September 2004