Search results

...mately achieve. Not everyone will accept or believe in every best case as real, but if ''even one'' [[Consumerium:Contributor]] does, then it will be list

...https://www.rooffunding.com/ (.com)] is a Korean P2P financing service for real estate * https://www.bulkestate.com/en/ is an Estonian real estate crowdfunding and group-buying platform

...to <nowiki>[[Product:Product name]]</nowiki> and <nowiki>[[Company:Company name]]</nowiki> can also be decoded from the GTIN. It could be possible to creat ...n. Since anyone can make their own defaults file and pass it along as "the real deal" the Consumerium defaults don't matter much.

...and only that view. When [[factionally-defined term]]s come to be seen as real by such a group, they may find other factions incomprehensible or consider

...r to accept or reject it. It is normally considered proof that one has no real argument to offer against or for what is said, if one must invoke "who wrot ...ture]] similar to that of [[bureaucracy]] or [[academia]], where a trusted name can spout nonsense for years without being detected or kicked out, and wher

...f view''', which is then naturally contested by those claiming to have the real [[NPOV]] due to '''might makes right''' mentality. It is a warlike view of ...as one big '''"troll" against powerful corporations, governments and other real life power structures'''

...not the operator. A controversial project like [[Consumerium]] that has a real economic effect via the [[Consumerium buying signal]] will attract all kind

*Anonymous edits are allowed. Thus no [[use real names]] policy enforced, other then conflicting names may be moved.

'''[http://sourceforge.net/projects/consuml ConsuML] is the project name for developing XML grammar on [[Sourceforge]].''' *[[companies]] and other real organisations and their interrelations

...himself the right to resolve or even redefine any political dispute in the real world and decide who is right for Wikipedia's purposes... this is an unwise

...[[controversial issues]] at all, that deal with [[political disputes]] and real [[power structure]]s - it is therefore hard to tell any kind of [[vandalism ...]] and [[echo chamber]] problems. [[Conflicts between users]] is a better name if it is anything other than '''simple vandalism''' that is reverted by mor

[[Consumerium]] under the name [[User:Juxhomosexual]], a name that seems to deliberately attempt to insult or smear our beloved [[Lowest In any case, since "User_name_removed" is not a real human's name,

...e overbuilding of [[pulp and paper]] mills under Suharto and his infamous "real forestry minister" and golf partner, [[Bob Hasan]], who centrally controlle

...ne of these poor management methods will be able to generate or respond to real world pressures, and only work in a fantasy world, like video games, which ....e. it is a [[Consumerium:political dispute]] or something that reflects a real world POV difference.

...some think it should not exist. Only real communities making decisions of real importance probably need truly and totally secret ballots. This would be l :The real problem is of course "who gets to vote" - no matter what their contribution

...on]]s concerned with the impact of online information and decisions on the real world.

...tionally, but controversially, measured as the percent rate of increase in real [[Gross Domestic Product]], or ''GDP''. [[Net Domestic Product]] is anothe ...s produced. This is not however the only issue with measuring growth in a real [[service economy]] where both [[state services]] and [[nature's services]]

...ation for having an initial board consisting of people affiliated with the real action the foundation is succesfully supporting. ...retards the project considerably, contrast [[LongNow]]'s success at doing real action. It is only the [[sysop power structure]] and [[priestly hierarchy]

...[[conceptual metaphor]] of Wikipedia and other wikis that insist one [[use real names]] (and thus be subject to offline abuse by sysops and their friends).

...r to accept or reject it. It is normally considered proof that one has no real argument to offer against what is said, if one must invoke "who wrote it" a