Search results

  • ...power structure]] is a main responsibility of the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. Failing to ensure this can make it legally liable.
    1 KB (205 words) - 03:32, 16 February 2004
  • It is a grave concern of the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. A good policy would be that no information can be revealed and attached
    2 KB (253 words) - 20:15, 22 February 2005
  • ...ndards to research about itself, as to research about any other company or organization, will weaken project credibility to the point where probably no one will ca
    2 KB (269 words) - 19:23, 27 August 2005
  • [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] has to balance these choices.
    2 KB (268 words) - 18:47, 25 January 2005
  • The [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] may also decide that:
    1 KB (228 words) - 01:26, 25 November 2003
  • ...we must expect they will be received often by the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. It must in turn be able to respond clearly why it believes it is not gu
    1 KB (237 words) - 03:18, 16 February 2004
  • ...some degree - so this should be escalated to the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]].
    2 KB (249 words) - 22:54, 9 March 2004
  • ...that, there may be nothing more we can say. The [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] will have to make day to day decisions about where to trust in other proj
    2 KB (265 words) - 19:14, 25 November 2003
  • It is expected to become a major issue for the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]], as it has already for [[Wikimedia]]. Prominent nests are rare as they a
    1 KB (194 words) - 20:42, 26 January 2005
  • ...led critique of [[Wikimedia corruption]] to guide [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] to avoid the same mistakes, many of them obvious
    988 bytes (126 words) - 17:07, 12 April 2021
  • The [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] should approve all arrangements with any group entity, if only so that [[
    2 KB (244 words) - 21:52, 21 May 2004
  • ...nance]], either through [[Central Services]] that [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] contracts, or, [[Distributed Consumerium]] if and when that exists.
    1 KB (219 words) - 21:02, 25 November 2003
  • [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] will have to decide how best to deal with it in the [[Content Wiki]] and
    2 KB (258 words) - 19:30, 25 November 2003
  • The [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] should be quite aware of the consequences of interfering with the natural
    2 KB (299 words) - 04:01, 23 August 2004
  • ...by proving it works for simpler problems like the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] or a [[guild]]. Or maybe not.
    2 KB (290 words) - 19:35, 25 November 2003
  • *serious [[liability]] is involved for the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]], especially for [[red light]]s; ''see [[Publish:governance]] and [[langu
    2 KB (232 words) - 20:54, 10 March 2005
  • ...ge scope, and having an ideology that trusts technology and informal group organization way too much, far more than any coherent theory of political science says t
    2 KB (285 words) - 22:13, 21 December 2003
  • ...ld be no need for an audit regime run only by the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]].
    2 KB (296 words) - 01:13, 25 November 2003
  • Because any such criteria are required by an organization, and the individual spending doesn't make this decision, this is an ideal p
    2 KB (281 words) - 00:58, 13 June 2005
  • *a [[consultant]] deliberately hired by the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] to bust up some [[groupthink]] or address some [[privacy]] concern withou ...by working on. That way there is no need for the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] to intervene nor to take any political stance. This is obviously ideal,
    4 KB (625 words) - 12:05, 18 August 2013
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)