Page view: Difference between revisions

320 bytes added ,  16 July 2004
what is "disabled for performance reasons" is highly arbitrary. the corruption explanation is as good as any other, probably more likely
(wikipedia has disabled pageviews for performance reasons. pls stop claiming everything they do is because they are corrupt; it's starting to be quite annoying reading the same accusations over and ove)
(what is "disabled for performance reasons" is highly arbitrary. the corruption explanation is as good as any other, probably more likely)
Line 11: Line 11:


::It's disabled for performance reasons. memcaching pages would not be applicable if the counter were enabled, so it's not corruption, it's '''pragmatism''' --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 13:21, 16 Jul 2004 (EEST)
::It's disabled for performance reasons. memcaching pages would not be applicable if the counter were enabled, so it's not corruption, it's '''pragmatism''' --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 13:21, 16 Jul 2004 (EEST)
:::Pragmatism is the universal excuse to rationalize corruption.  How do you know what it "is" or not?  Why not disable logins "for performance reasons" too, or [[watchlist]]s?  They don't, because that would also disable [[sysop power structure]].  So what is "disabled for performance reasons" is highly arbitrary.
Anonymous user