Talk:New Troll point of view: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
But, some people do seem to need these [[ideology]] statements to get comfort with what is going on. This essay is a good start, and trolls will gnaw on it for a while in the dark. Then we will write something that totally disagrees. ;-) | But, some people do seem to need these [[ideology]] statements to get comfort with what is going on. This essay is a good start, and trolls will gnaw on it for a while in the dark. Then we will write something that totally disagrees. ;-) | ||
---------------- | |||
This was not offensive but it's speculative and pointless. Obviously if one takes any mass of postings one will find "contradictions between", but if the [[trolls]] refuse to say "who is who" (as they do) then there is no way to respond and leaving this here is to [[require response to hearsay]]. It's fair comment but just not as good as ending the essay on the reference to Foucault! | |||
==== Notable individuals ==== | |||
[http://develop.consumerium.org/wiki/index.php/142.177.X.X "142"] seems to be into this philosophy (although of course (s)he would dispute the characterization of 142 as an "individual"). | |||
Note however that [http://develop.consumerium.org/wiki/index.php/142.177.X.X/Anti_Wikipedia_Rants some] | |||
of 142's positions contrast with the Consumerium pro-troll philosophy, as described above. (for example, 142 advocates excluding certain specific people from positions of power in Consumerium, which is in conflict with the community-shouldn't-exclude philosophy seen above). | |||
Perhaps the philosophy was misunderstood here; perhaps other people contributed the contradicting parts; perhaps 142 changed hir mind; or perhaps 142 does not have stable "positions", since 142 does not consider itself an individual. | |||