28
edits
Board vote code: Difference between revisions
reply
(rm personal attack) |
Tim Starling (talk | contribs) (reply) |
||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
:''That's your story. It could be a [[cover story]]. He is certainly your ally in [[developer vigilantiism]] (huge [[IP range block]]s affecting whole cities simply to prevent challenge to the [[Sysop Vandal point of view]]) though he is prone to [[libel]] and so far you are not.'' --[[142.177.X.X]] | :''That's your story. It could be a [[cover story]]. He is certainly your ally in [[developer vigilantiism]] (huge [[IP range block]]s affecting whole cities simply to prevent challenge to the [[Sysop Vandal point of view]]) though he is prone to [[libel]] and so far you are not.'' --[[142.177.X.X]] | ||
Look, just because two people hate you doesn't mean they are co-conspirators. Erik and I are quite different in most respects, however we share the ability (along with most humans) to spot an asshole when we see one. The reason you are harassed wherever you go is because you actively work to make people angry, not because the people you attack are all part of a vast conspiracy to suppress what you have to say. -- [[User:Tim Starling|Tim Starling]] 05:03, 29 Jun 2004 (EEST) | Look, [name deleted], just because two people hate you doesn't mean they are co-conspirators. Erik and I are quite different in most respects, however we share the ability (along with most humans) to spot an asshole when we see one. The reason you are harassed wherever you go is because you actively work to make people angry, not because the people you attack are all part of a vast conspiracy to suppress what you have to say. -- [[User:Tim Starling|Tim Starling]] 05:03, 29 Jun 2004 (EEST) | ||
::To say "you actively work to make people angry" is to practice [[amateur psychiatry]]. To attach names to anonymous parties is probably [[libel]] and is at best unwise (and deleted to keep the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] out of trouble). To assert "the reason" is to claim [[God's Eye view]]. And "not because the people you attack are all part of a vast conspiracy" is probably more applicable to this theory that all the [[trolls]] are one person; --[[ | ::To say "you actively work to make people angry" is to practice [[amateur psychiatry]]. To attach names to anonymous parties is probably [[libel]] and is at best unwise (and deleted to keep the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] out of trouble). To assert "the reason" is to claim [[God's Eye view]]. And "not because the people you attack are all part of a vast conspiracy" is probably more applicable to this theory that all the [[trolls]] are one person; | ||
:::It's my opinion, idiot. Not amateur psychiatry or a pronouncement of absolute truth from a "God's Eye view". You ascribe motives to me, I ascribe motives to you. This is not psychiatry, just ordinary human interaction. -- [[User:Tim Starling|Tim Starling]] 05:56, 1 Jul 2004 (EEST) | |||
::What makes Tim Starling and Erik Moeller the same? amateur psychiatry, libel, God's Eye view, and assumption that [[alleged and collective identity]] can be somehow determined by their own personal emotions, which are very very damaged. | |||
:::You accuse me of "amateur psychiatry" and go on to say that my personal emotions are "very very damaged"? Well that's an interesting diagnosis, Dr. Hubley. Your hypocrisy knows no bounds. You claim you are not the same person as EoT? Not everyone surfs the Internet with a souped up Commodore 64, you know. -- [[User:Tim Starling|Tim Starling]] 05:56, 1 Jul 2004 (EEST) | |||
::If you fail to have even this degree of self-reflection, you are just stupid. This is of course no surprise to the [[trolls]], who will eventually eliminate you from any position of trust or responsibility in any serious project. | |||
:::Your delusions of grandeur are extraordinary. You really think you're going to lead an empire of trolls who will control every serious project in the world? -- [[User:Tim Starling|Tim Starling]] 05:56, 1 Jul 2004 (EEST) | |||