28
edits
User talk:N8chz: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(Welcome) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Welcome to [[Consumerium]] N8czh. [[Pubwan]] is of high interest to us here at consumerium. Expecially the link to http://www.upcdatabase.com/ that you've provided might prove enormously valuable to [[Consumerium:Itself]]. I hope you enjoy contributing to [[motivation|our cause]] --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 13:30, 13 Mar 2004 (EET) | Welcome to [[Consumerium]] N8czh. [[Pubwan]] is of high interest to us here at consumerium. Expecially the link to http://www.upcdatabase.com/ that you've provided might prove enormously valuable to [[Consumerium:Itself]]. I hope you enjoy contributing to [[motivation|our cause]] --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 13:30, 13 Mar 2004 (EET) | ||
---- | |||
''*large scale cataloging of package deals - like [[buying coops]]? We call these [[faction]]s and support [[institutional buying criteria]] they share'' | |||
Actually, what I (Lorraine Lee, aka n8chz) had in mind here is simply the linearization of nonlinear pricing schemes. I understand that pricing is not a primary concern of Consumerium. Prices are said to contain information, though. I can see how you do not want Consumerium to degenerate into a "shop bot." | |||
''*recruiting the [[Consumerium:contributor]] - which you call "information volunteer"'' | |||
My mama told me never to volunteer information. I don't see that strategy resulting in Consumerium or pubwan. | |||
''Please, though, we have enough abstract terminology! We don't need to talk about "virtual objects" and other such non-terms here. We need if anything to focus on the concretes, so your input at [[Consumerium User Stories]], [[best cases]], etc., is welcomed particularly.'' | |||
Sorry if I have confused. I too am confused, as I lack the vocabulary to describe the models I visualize, so I look up things. Sometimes the result is disappointing. | |||