Green Documentation License: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''Green Documentation [[licenses|License]]''' would presumably put some barriers in place to using documentation for any purposes that violates the [[six principles]] which all so-called [[w:Greens|Greens]] believe in, at least according to the [[w:Global Green Charter|Global Green Charter]]. There may also just be a simple set of restrictions that prevent its use for war and ecological devastation. At least, to the degree that any license can do that. | A '''Green Documentation [[licenses|License]]''' would presumably put some barriers in place to using documentation for any purposes that violates the [[six principles]] which all so-called [[w:Greens|Greens]] believe in, at least according to the [[w:Global Green Charter|Global Green Charter]]. There may also just be a simple set of restrictions that prevent its use for [[war]] and [[ecological devastation]]. At least, to the degree that any license can do that. | ||
While adding [[Invariant Section]]s (which are [[Secondary Section]]s) to the [[GNU FDL]] may warn against use for some purposes, it can't actually prevent such use. | |||
A GDL is clearly not [[Free according to Debian]]. But of course, who cares? | |||
See also [[Green Software License]], [[Green Patent License]]. | See also [[Green Software License]], [[Green Patent License]]. | ||