Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,854
edits
(disambiguating three types of so-called "content") |
(attempting to fix a misleading sentence) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The idea of '''content''' is basically stupid. We must be more specific. Let us refer separately to | The idea of '''content''' is basically stupid. We must be more specific. Let us refer separately to | ||
* | *Development-oriented [[open content]], e.g. [[Develop Wiki]] '''content''' - and is presently entirely under [[GFDL]]. | ||
*More than a few [[interesting companies]], [[interesting projects]] and [[links]] are primarily interesting because they might provide [[Research Wiki]] '''content'''. The [[license]] and [[political choice]] implied by it might lead us to some [[worst cases]] so we should consider this carefully. | *More than a few [[interesting companies]], [[interesting projects]] and [[links]] are primarily interesting because they might provide [[Research Wiki]] '''content'''. The [[license]] and [[political choice]] implied by it might lead us to some [[worst cases]] so we should consider this carefully. | ||
*[[Publish Wiki]] '''content''' is the primary concern of the [[governance organization]], i.e. [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] delivering [[Consumerium Services]] formally and legally and assuming all [[liability]]. | *[[Publish Wiki]] '''content''' is the primary concern of the [[governance organization]], i.e. [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] delivering [[Consumerium Services]] formally and legally and assuming all [[liability]]. |