The Consumerium Exchange: Difference between revisions

The Consumerium Exchange (edit)

Revision as of 12:38, 5 October 2003

1,472 bytes removed , 5 October 2003

m

moving the different types of votes to their own articles

Jukeboksi

Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators

9,854

edits

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 Every person gets two votes on each issue:
-*An indirect vote. This vote cannot be used directly, but can be assigned to an '''registered''' not-for-profit organsation, including potentially a [[political party]], that uses the voting power as decided by the governance of the organisation, thus rendering the identity of the vote holder anonymous. For verification purposes it might be a reasonable requirement that you must be a member of, or a donor to, the organisation that you give your voting power to. You may give your vote to only one organisation at a time. You may transfer it to an another organisation or just revoke it. The Burden of proof on the right to use a vote is mostly on the organisation in question.
+*An [[Indirect Vote]].
+*A [[Direct Vote]].
-*A direct vote. This is perhaps a little unfair since people who don't have access to computer systems are likely unable to use their direct vote. Burden of proof on authentication is yet to be solved. A partial solution could be to divide the direct votes into three distinct groups and let the consumers decide on the amount of trust they place on each group of voters:
-#Voters authenticated with cryptographic methods, where the identity of the keyholder is known by an commercial or non-commercial certification authority.
-#Voters authenticated by an email address issued by an institutional issuer such as an university, school, company or a governmental organisation ie. where it is publicly known that the postmaster checks the identities of people before issuing an email address
-#The rest ie. anonymous email services
 Where issue is a disputed article or a [[campaign]].