Talk:Wiki linking: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(make en:w: and fr:w: work, and we'll try to solve language problems; until then, you are asking us to solve Wikipedia problems, and we refuse.)
No edit summary
 
Line 24: Line 24:


::So make [[en:w:]] and [[fr:w:]] work, and disable the reverse, and we'll try to solve language problems;  until then, you are asking us to solve Wikipedia problems, and we refuse
::So make [[en:w:]] and [[fr:w:]] work, and disable the reverse, and we'll try to solve language problems;  until then, you are asking us to solve Wikipedia problems, and we refuse
::[[en:gfdl:]] and [[en:neutral:]] would be even better.  Then the best GFDL source, or best neutral source, could be determined dynamically by the service, without requiring every author to care, or track the decline of [[Wikipedia]] or the rise of [[Wikinfo]] or [[Metaweb]] or whatever.  Really the best GFDL source this week is [[Recyclopedia]] since it has a very recent [[Wikipedia]] dump, and more accurate articles that have no censorship of concepts critical to [[Consumerium]].
Anonymous user