Content: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    (disambiguating three types of so-called "content")
     
    (attempting to fix a misleading sentence)
     
    Line 1: Line 1:
    The idea of '''content''' is basically stupid.  We must be more specific.  Let us refer separately to
    The idea of '''content''' is basically stupid.  We must be more specific.  Let us refer separately to


    *[[What Consumerium RD Wiki is not|Development-oriented]] [[open content]], e.g. under a [[Green Documentation License]] as opposed to [[wiki code]] under a [[Green Software License]] which is [[Develop Wiki]] '''content''' - and is presently entirely under [[GFDL]].
    *Development-oriented [[open content]], e.g. [[Develop Wiki]] '''content''' - and is presently entirely under [[GFDL]].
    *More than a few [[interesting companies]], [[interesting projects]] and [[links]] are primarily interesting because they might provide [[Research Wiki]] '''content'''.  The [[license]] and [[political choice]] implied by it might lead us to some [[worst cases]] so we should consider this carefully.
    *More than a few [[interesting companies]], [[interesting projects]] and [[links]] are primarily interesting because they might provide [[Research Wiki]] '''content'''.  The [[license]] and [[political choice]] implied by it might lead us to some [[worst cases]] so we should consider this carefully.
    *[[Publish Wiki]] '''content''' is the primary concern of the [[governance organization]], i.e. [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] delivering [[Consumerium Services]] formally and legally and assuming all [[liability]].
    *[[Publish Wiki]] '''content''' is the primary concern of the [[governance organization]], i.e. [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] delivering [[Consumerium Services]] formally and legally and assuming all [[liability]].

    Latest revision as of 12:38, 19 August 2004

    The idea of content is basically stupid. We must be more specific. Let us refer separately to