Content Wiki: Difference between revisions
minor note about namespaces |
m minor reword |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==What is the Content Wiki?== | ==What is the Content Wiki?== | ||
Content Wiki is where '''facts''' on [[product]]s and [[companies]] and such will be stored. | Content Wiki is where '''facts''' on [[product]]s and [[companies]] and such will be stored when it gets built. | ||
'''Opinions''' (ie. [[Campaign]]s and split articles) go to [[The Consumerium Exchange]] | '''Opinions''' (ie. [[Campaign]]s and split articles) go to [[The Consumerium Exchange]] when it gets built. | ||
This page is not for actual [[features|content]] but for developing the syntax and governance of the Content Wiki so we can set one up. | This page is not for actual [[features|content]] but for developing the syntax and governance of the Content Wiki so we can set one up. | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
==Other Open Questions== | ==Other Open Questions== | ||
===How to handle the internationalization?=== | ===How to handle the internationalization?=== | ||
Should all language versions strive to contain the same information or how should we go about this? | Should all language versions strive to contain the same information or how should we go about this? | ||
Revision as of 17:15, 28 September 2003
What is the Content Wiki?
Content Wiki is where facts on products and companies and such will be stored when it gets built.
Opinions (ie. Campaigns and split articles) go to The Consumerium Exchange when it gets built.
This page is not for actual content but for developing the syntax and governance of the Content Wiki so we can set one up.
Wiki software
To fork or not to fork that is the question. It is natural to presume that the wiki softare will be either:
- MediaWiki unmodified
- MediaWiki modified
- A fork of MediaWiki
Which one of these alternatives makes sense is an open question
Wiki Syntax
If an modified version will be used it makes sense to use many more namespaces to make the wiki more manageable, but on the other hand using standard MediaWiki has many advantages. Using unmodified MediaWiki would just require stricter syntax within the articles
According to MediaWiki developers adding numerous namespaces is easy so here is a brief and uncomplete list of likely namespaces:
Governance
We need a summarum of the currently existing Wiki Governace Practices here and study each one and the resulting model that we will use will likely be a synthesis of numerous existing models
Background: There is already information on companies, brands, labels and such in Wikipedia and Disinfopedia.
- How to avoid redundant copy-pasting between wikis?
- How will the recording of information be coordinated to benefit the consumer in her/his search for knowldge on offered products?
- The obivious thing that comes to mind would be to build an interwiki watchlist type of utility that would enable tracking changes to articles with matching article names across multiple wikis. This would most likely interest the editors of all the involved wikis.
Other Open Questions
How to handle the internationalization?
Should all language versions strive to contain the same information or how should we go about this?